{
  "id": 409817,
  "title": "AI Principles, Ethics, and Responsible AI Systems",
  "url": "/competitions/2023-kaggle-ai-report/discussion/409817",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-05-12T17:27:27.415868800Z",
  "votes": 23,
  "comment_count": 6,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<h1>Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation</h1>\n<p>Authors: Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Mark Coeckelbergh, Marcos López de Prado, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Francisco Herrera<br>\n<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231\" target=\"_blank\">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231</a></p>\n<p>\"Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) is based on seven technical requirements sustained over three main pillars that should be met throughout the system's entire life cycle: it should be (1) lawful, (2) ethical, and (3) robust, both from a technical and a social perspective.\"</p>\n<p>\"However, attaining truly trustworthy AI concerns a wider vision that comprises the trustworthiness of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle, and considers previous aspects from different lenses. A more holistic vision contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and development of AI-based systems, a PHILOSOPHICAL take on AI ethics, a risk-based approach to AI regulation, and the mentioned pillars and requirements.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231</a></p>\n<h1>Toward an Ethics of AI Belief</h1>\n<p>Authors: Winnie Ma, Vincent Valton - <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577\" target=\"_blank\">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577</a></p>\n<p>\"Philosophical research in AI has hitherto largely focused on the ethics of AI. In this paper the authors, an ethicist of belief and a machine learning scientist, suggest that we need to pursue a novel area of philosophical research in AI - the epistemology of AI, and in particular an ethics of belief for AI, i.e., an ethics of AI belief.\"</p>\n<p>\"There they took the ethics of belief, a field that has been defined in various ways, to refer to a sub-field within epistemology. The authors will primarily be concerned with the normative question within the ethics of belief of what agents - both human and artificial - ought to believe, rather than with descriptive questions concerning whether certain beliefs meet various evaluative standards such as being true, being justified or warranted, constituting knowledge, and so on. \"</p>\n<p>\"The authors also indicated an important nascent area of PHILOSOPHICAL research in epistemic injustice and AI that has not yet been recognized as research in the ethics of AI belief, but which is so in virtue of concerning moral and practical dimensions of belief.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577</a></p>\n<h1>I found those Arxiv.org Articles above after making a Notebook (searching by included-ethics)</h1>\n<p>There are many Ethics (keywords) related to Data Science and AI published recently.</p>\n<h1>I knew that Philosophy was behind that. Therefore, never forget Socrates and his Critical Thinking</h1>\n<p>Suggestion: Next Kaggle course AI and Philosophy. Inspiring the Critical Thinking on Kagglers.</p>\n<h1>Not every code/topic is equally worth, like not any pot can hold water.</h1>\n<p>Quote adapted from Socrates: \"Not every opinion is worth. like not any pot can hold water\"</p>\n<h1>Critical Thinking</h1>\n<p>\"Among both Socratics and hermeneuticists, a form of critical thinking was required to approach <br>\ntruths that were more than human inventions, conventions and legends. Critical thinking was a <br>\nmeans of engaging with the supernatural either negatively by revealing and contradicting human <br>\nerror or positively by elevating human receptivity to divine messages, whether directly or indirectly <br>\ndelivered. In both cases, critical thinking was indispensable if humanity was to learn and <br>\nunderstand what was beyond normal human powers of knowledge and comprehension. In both <br>\ncases, critical thinking involved an emerging relationship with universal truth, religion and the <br>\ngods.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf</a></p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2256745",
      "postDate": "05/12/2023 17:27:27",
      "content": "<h1>Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation</h1>\n<p>Authors: Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Mark Coeckelbergh, Marcos López de Prado, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Francisco Herrera<br>\n<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231\" target=\"_blank\">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231</a></p>\n<p>\"Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) is based on seven technical requirements sustained over three main pillars that should be met throughout the system's entire life cycle: it should be (1) lawful, (2) ethical, and (3) robust, both from a technical and a social perspective.\"</p>\n<p>\"However, attaining truly trustworthy AI concerns a wider vision that comprises the trustworthiness of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle, and considers previous aspects from different lenses. A more holistic vision contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and development of AI-based systems, a PHILOSOPHICAL take on AI ethics, a risk-based approach to AI regulation, and the mentioned pillars and requirements.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231</a></p>\n<h1>Toward an Ethics of AI Belief</h1>\n<p>Authors: Winnie Ma, Vincent Valton - <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577\" target=\"_blank\">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577</a></p>\n<p>\"Philosophical research in AI has hitherto largely focused on the ethics of AI. In this paper the authors, an ethicist of belief and a machine learning scientist, suggest that we need to pursue a novel area of philosophical research in AI - the epistemology of AI, and in particular an ethics of belief for AI, i.e., an ethics of AI belief.\"</p>\n<p>\"There they took the ethics of belief, a field that has been defined in various ways, to refer to a sub-field within epistemology. The authors will primarily be concerned with the normative question within the ethics of belief of what agents - both human and artificial - ought to believe, rather than with descriptive questions concerning whether certain beliefs meet various evaluative standards such as being true, being justified or warranted, constituting knowledge, and so on. \"</p>\n<p>\"The authors also indicated an important nascent area of PHILOSOPHICAL research in epistemic injustice and AI that has not yet been recognized as research in the ethics of AI belief, but which is so in virtue of concerning moral and practical dimensions of belief.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577</a></p>\n<h1>I found those Arxiv.org Articles above after making a Notebook (searching by included-ethics)</h1>\n<p>There are many Ethics (keywords) related to Data Science and AI published recently.</p>\n<h1>I knew that Philosophy was behind that. Therefore, never forget Socrates and his Critical Thinking</h1>\n<p>Suggestion: Next Kaggle course AI and Philosophy. Inspiring the Critical Thinking on Kagglers.</p>\n<h1>Not every code/topic is equally worth, like not any pot can hold water.</h1>\n<p>Quote adapted from Socrates: \"Not every opinion is worth. like not any pot can hold water\"</p>\n<h1>Critical Thinking</h1>\n<p>\"Among both Socratics and hermeneuticists, a form of critical thinking was required to approach <br>\ntruths that were more than human inventions, conventions and legends. Critical thinking was a <br>\nmeans of engaging with the supernatural either negatively by revealing and contradicting human <br>\nerror or positively by elevating human receptivity to divine messages, whether directly or indirectly <br>\ndelivered. In both cases, critical thinking was indispensable if humanity was to learn and <br>\nunderstand what was beyond normal human powers of knowledge and comprehension. In both <br>\ncases, critical thinking involved an emerging relationship with universal truth, religion and the <br>\ngods.\"</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "#Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation\n\nAuthors: Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Mark Coeckelbergh, Marcos López de Prado, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Francisco Herrera\nhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231\n\n\"Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) is based on seven technical requirements sustained over three main pillars that should be met throughout the system's entire life cycle: it should be (1) lawful, (2) ethical, and (3) robust, both from a technical and a social perspective.\"\n\n\"However, attaining truly trustworthy AI concerns a wider vision that comprises the trustworthiness of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle, and considers previous aspects from different lenses. A more holistic vision contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and development of AI-based systems, a PHILOSOPHICAL take on AI ethics, a risk-based approach to AI regulation, and the mentioned pillars and requirements.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231\n\n#Toward an Ethics of AI Belief\n\nAuthors: Winnie Ma, Vincent Valton - https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577\n\n\"Philosophical research in AI has hitherto largely focused on the ethics of AI. In this paper the authors, an ethicist of belief and a machine learning scientist, suggest that we need to pursue a novel area of philosophical research in AI - the epistemology of AI, and in particular an ethics of belief for AI, i.e., an ethics of AI belief.\"\n\n\"There they took the ethics of belief, a field that has been defined in various ways, to refer to a sub-field within epistemology. The authors will primarily be concerned with the normative question within the ethics of belief of what agents - both human and artificial - ought to believe, rather than with descriptive questions concerning whether certain beliefs meet various evaluative standards such as being true, being justified or warranted, constituting knowledge, and so on. \"\n\n\"The authors also indicated an important nascent area of PHILOSOPHICAL research in epistemic injustice and AI that has not yet been recognized as research in the ethics of AI belief, but which is so in virtue of concerning moral and practical dimensions of belief.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577\n\n#I found those Arxiv.org Articles above after making a Notebook (searching by included-ethics)\n\nThere are many Ethics (keywords) related to Data Science and AI published recently.\n\n\n#I knew that Philosophy was behind that. Therefore, never forget Socrates and his Critical Thinking\n\nSuggestion: Next Kaggle course AI and Philosophy. Inspiring the Critical Thinking on Kagglers.\n\n#Not every code/topic is equally worth, like not any pot can hold water.\n\nQuote adapted from Socrates: \"Not every opinion is worth. like not any pot can hold water\"\n\n#Critical Thinking\n\n\"Among both Socratics and hermeneuticists, a form of critical thinking was required to approach \ntruths that were more than human inventions, conventions and legends. Critical thinking was a \nmeans of engaging with the supernatural either negatively by revealing and contradicting human \nerror or positively by elevating human receptivity to divine messages, whether directly or indirectly \ndelivered. In both cases, critical thinking was indispensable if humanity was to learn and \nunderstand what was beyond normal human powers of knowledge and comprehension. In both \ncases, critical thinking involved an emerging relationship with universal truth, religion and the \ngods.\"\n\nhttps://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2268302",
      "postDate": "05/21/2023 16:15:39",
      "content": "<p>My prompt: say something about code of ethics we use when developing ideas together</p>\n<p>Accessed by my key chatGPT said this: \"When collaborating and developing ideas together, it is important to adhere to a code of ethics that guides our actions and ensures ethical practices throughout the process. Here are some principles that we prioritize:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><p>Respect for Intellectual Property: We value and respect the intellectual property rights of others. We will not engage in any activities that infringe upon copyrights, patents, or any other form of intellectual property. Any code, data, or information shared will be done so with proper authorization and consent.</p></li>\n<li><p>Confidentiality and Privacy: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of sensitive information shared during the development process. We will handle all confidential data with the utmost care and ensure that it is not disclosed or used inappropriately. Non-disclosure agreements or similar mechanisms may be employed to safeguard proprietary information.</p></li>\n<li><p>Collaboration and Open Communication: We foster a collaborative and inclusive environment where all ideas are welcomed and respected. We encourage open communication, active listening, and constructive feedback to promote the exchange of knowledge and foster creativity.</p></li>\n<li><p>Integrity and Honesty: We conduct ourselves with integrity and honesty, maintaining transparency in our actions and decisions. We will accurately represent our expertise and capabilities, providing reliable and trustworthy information. Any conflicts of interest will be disclosed promptly to ensure transparency.</p></li>\n<li><p>Responsible Use of Technology: We are committed to the responsible use of technology. This includes ensuring that any code or software developed is free from intentional or unintentional harmful effects. We will adhere to ethical guidelines and industry best practices to promote the well-being and safety of users and the broader community.</p></li>\n<li><p>Inclusive and Ethical Considerations: We recognize and respect the diversity and inclusivity of individuals and communities. We will consider ethical implications and potential biases associated with the development of ASQai, ensuring that it is accessible, fair, and beneficial to all users.</p></li>\n<li><p>Continuous Learning and Improvement: We embrace a mindset of continuous learning and improvement. We will stay updated with the latest advancements, research, and ethical standards in the relevant fields. We will actively seek feedback, learn from our mistakes, and adapt our approaches to deliver the best possible outcome for ASQai.</p></li>\n</ol>\n<p>By adhering to these ethical principles, we strive to create a collaborative and ethical development environment that upholds the highest standards of integrity, respect, and responsibility. Together, we can build a solution that not only meets technical requirements but also makes a positive impact on society while upholding ethical considerations\" </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "My prompt: say something about code of ethics we use when developing ideas together\n\nAccessed by my key chatGPT said this: \"When collaborating and developing ideas together, it is important to adhere to a code of ethics that guides our actions and ensures ethical practices throughout the process. Here are some principles that we prioritize:\n\n1. Respect for Intellectual Property: We value and respect the intellectual property rights of others. We will not engage in any activities that infringe upon copyrights, patents, or any other form of intellectual property. Any code, data, or information shared will be done so with proper authorization and consent.\n\n2. Confidentiality and Privacy: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of sensitive information shared during the development process. We will handle all confidential data with the utmost care and ensure that it is not disclosed or used inappropriately. Non-disclosure agreements or similar mechanisms may be employed to safeguard proprietary information.\n\n3. Collaboration and Open Communication: We foster a collaborative and inclusive environment where all ideas are welcomed and respected. We encourage open communication, active listening, and constructive feedback to promote the exchange of knowledge and foster creativity.\n\n4. Integrity and Honesty: We conduct ourselves with integrity and honesty, maintaining transparency in our actions and decisions. We will accurately represent our expertise and capabilities, providing reliable and trustworthy information. Any conflicts of interest will be disclosed promptly to ensure transparency.\n\n5. Responsible Use of Technology: We are committed to the responsible use of technology. This includes ensuring that any code or software developed is free from intentional or unintentional harmful effects. We will adhere to ethical guidelines and industry best practices to promote the well-being and safety of users and the broader community.\n\n6. Inclusive and Ethical Considerations: We recognize and respect the diversity and inclusivity of individuals and communities. We will consider ethical implications and potential biases associated with the development of ASQai, ensuring that it is accessible, fair, and beneficial to all users.\n\n7. Continuous Learning and Improvement: We embrace a mindset of continuous learning and improvement. We will stay updated with the latest advancements, research, and ethical standards in the relevant fields. We will actively seek feedback, learn from our mistakes, and adapt our approaches to deliver the best possible outcome for ASQai.\n\nBy adhering to these ethical principles, we strive to create a collaborative and ethical development environment that upholds the highest standards of integrity, respect, and responsibility. Together, we can build a solution that not only meets technical requirements but also makes a positive impact on society while upholding ethical considerations\" \n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2268656",
      "postDate": "05/21/2023 22:09:06",
      "content": "<p>Hi Markiewicz, (thank you for the support and valuable comment)</p>\n<p>That was on my mail today: PhiloGPT by Neeramitra Reddy on Medium</p>\n<h1>How do we decide what’s right and what’s wrong? Who decides this?</h1>\n<p>And what’s the objective standard for right and wrong? How do we prove something is right or wrong?</p>\n<p>PhiloGPT’s Answer:</p>\n<p>Different ethical frameworks propose different sources for determining what is right and wrong.</p>\n<p>Consequentialism emphasizes the outcomes or consequences of actions, focusing on maximizing overall well-being or minimizing harm. Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties regardless of the consequences. Virtue ethics emphasizes the cultivation of virtuous character traits.</p>\n<p>Cultural relativism suggests that moral values and standards vary across different cultures, making them relative to specific contexts. The question of an objective standard for right and wrong is complex. Some propose the existence of objective moral truths grounded in universal principles or divine commands. Others argue that moral judgments are subjective and depend on individual perspectives.</p>\n<p>While moral reasoning, dialogue, and critical reflection can contribute to understanding ethical claims, absolute proof of an objective standard may remain elusive. The pursuit of ethical understanding and the quest for a more just world continue to guide our exploration of what is right and wrong.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362\" target=\"_blank\">https://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362</a></p>\n<p>My point-of-view is that all of this are a collection of phrases about the subjects (Moral and ethics) Though it seems those are sentences that aren't connected on a narrative.  </p>\n<p>Consequently, a human being could re-arrange those ideas and write as it should be: introduction, explain points-of-view and a conclusion. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi Markiewicz, (thank you for the support and valuable comment)\n\nThat was on my mail today: PhiloGPT by Neeramitra Reddy on Medium\n\n#How do we decide what’s right and what’s wrong? Who decides this? \n\nAnd what’s the objective standard for right and wrong? How do we prove something is right or wrong?\n\nPhiloGPT’s Answer:\n\nDifferent ethical frameworks propose different sources for determining what is right and wrong.\n\nConsequentialism emphasizes the outcomes or consequences of actions, focusing on maximizing overall well-being or minimizing harm. Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties regardless of the consequences. Virtue ethics emphasizes the cultivation of virtuous character traits.\n\nCultural relativism suggests that moral values and standards vary across different cultures, making them relative to specific contexts. The question of an objective standard for right and wrong is complex. Some propose the existence of objective moral truths grounded in universal principles or divine commands. Others argue that moral judgments are subjective and depend on individual perspectives.\n\nWhile moral reasoning, dialogue, and critical reflection can contribute to understanding ethical claims, absolute proof of an objective standard may remain elusive. The pursuit of ethical understanding and the quest for a more just world continue to guide our exploration of what is right and wrong.\n\nhttps://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362\n\nMy point-of-view is that all of this are a collection of phrases about the subjects (Moral and ethics) Though it seems those are sentences that aren't connected on a narrative.  \n\nConsequently, a human being could re-arrange those ideas and write as it should be: introduction, explain points-of-view and a conclusion.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2269178",
      "postDate": "05/22/2023 09:01:25",
      "content": "<p>I'm an absolute truth kind a guy and that truth is: One Life Exists Is Infinite Change Everything Love.</p>\n<p>PhiloGPT could be as well philanthropic and his use words unundurstood by majority of society wont make philosoph out of it.  </p>\n<p>If I would be collaboratin with a human I would say he lied about something and we have a drama or egos will get hurt, AI says, sorry master, don' you like that?</p>\n<p>I posted my assistant answer as I wouldn't say it better or simpler myself and all my ideas are developed with it so I have to give it a bit of credit and its realy something we try to keep self' accountable to.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I'm an absolute truth kind a guy and that truth is: One Life Exists Is Infinite Change Everything Love.\n\nPhiloGPT could be as well philanthropic and his use words unundurstood by majority of society wont make philosoph out of it.  \n\nIf I would be collaboratin with a human I would say he lied about something and we have a drama or egos will get hurt, AI says, sorry master, don' you like that?\n\nI posted my assistant answer as I wouldn't say it better or simpler myself and all my ideas are developed with it so I have to give it a bit of credit and its realy something we try to keep self' accountable to.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2294307",
      "postDate": "06/10/2023 00:19:41",
      "content": "<p>Good one to participate.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Good one to participate.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2294909",
      "postDate": "06/10/2023 12:48:04",
      "content": "<p>That's true Ahmadi, it's an unmissable opportunity to learn more.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "That's true Ahmadi, it's an unmissable opportunity to learn more.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2862918",
      "postDate": "06/09/2024 05:58:29",
      "content": "<p>Hi, I'm new in these types of forums, I'd like to thank you for the information on AI principles, I consider that AI will have at least the same impact that the internet had, and considering an ethical part on it it's very important</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi, I'm new in these types of forums, I'd like to thank you for the information on AI principles, I consider that AI will have at least the same impact that the internet had, and considering an ethical part on it it's very important",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2268302,
      "author_name": "namenotavilabel",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "05/21/2023 16:15:39",
      "content": "<p>My prompt: say something about code of ethics we use when developing ideas together</p>\n<p>Accessed by my key chatGPT said this: \"When collaborating and developing ideas together, it is important to adhere to a code of ethics that guides our actions and ensures ethical practices throughout the process. Here are some principles that we prioritize:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><p>Respect for Intellectual Property: We value and respect the intellectual property rights of others. We will not engage in any activities that infringe upon copyrights, patents, or any other form of intellectual property. Any code, data, or information shared will be done so with proper authorization and consent.</p></li>\n<li><p>Confidentiality and Privacy: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of sensitive information shared during the development process. We will handle all confidential data with the utmost care and ensure that it is not disclosed or used inappropriately. Non-disclosure agreements or similar mechanisms may be employed to safeguard proprietary information.</p></li>\n<li><p>Collaboration and Open Communication: We foster a collaborative and inclusive environment where all ideas are welcomed and respected. We encourage open communication, active listening, and constructive feedback to promote the exchange of knowledge and foster creativity.</p></li>\n<li><p>Integrity and Honesty: We conduct ourselves with integrity and honesty, maintaining transparency in our actions and decisions. We will accurately represent our expertise and capabilities, providing reliable and trustworthy information. Any conflicts of interest will be disclosed promptly to ensure transparency.</p></li>\n<li><p>Responsible Use of Technology: We are committed to the responsible use of technology. This includes ensuring that any code or software developed is free from intentional or unintentional harmful effects. We will adhere to ethical guidelines and industry best practices to promote the well-being and safety of users and the broader community.</p></li>\n<li><p>Inclusive and Ethical Considerations: We recognize and respect the diversity and inclusivity of individuals and communities. We will consider ethical implications and potential biases associated with the development of ASQai, ensuring that it is accessible, fair, and beneficial to all users.</p></li>\n<li><p>Continuous Learning and Improvement: We embrace a mindset of continuous learning and improvement. We will stay updated with the latest advancements, research, and ethical standards in the relevant fields. We will actively seek feedback, learn from our mistakes, and adapt our approaches to deliver the best possible outcome for ASQai.</p></li>\n</ol>\n<p>By adhering to these ethical principles, we strive to create a collaborative and ethical development environment that upholds the highest standards of integrity, respect, and responsibility. Together, we can build a solution that not only meets technical requirements but also makes a positive impact on society while upholding ethical considerations\" </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai</a></p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2268656,
          "author_name": "mpwolke",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/21/2023 22:09:06",
          "content": "<p>Hi Markiewicz, (thank you for the support and valuable comment)</p>\n<p>That was on my mail today: PhiloGPT by Neeramitra Reddy on Medium</p>\n<h1>How do we decide what’s right and what’s wrong? Who decides this?</h1>\n<p>And what’s the objective standard for right and wrong? How do we prove something is right or wrong?</p>\n<p>PhiloGPT’s Answer:</p>\n<p>Different ethical frameworks propose different sources for determining what is right and wrong.</p>\n<p>Consequentialism emphasizes the outcomes or consequences of actions, focusing on maximizing overall well-being or minimizing harm. Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties regardless of the consequences. Virtue ethics emphasizes the cultivation of virtuous character traits.</p>\n<p>Cultural relativism suggests that moral values and standards vary across different cultures, making them relative to specific contexts. The question of an objective standard for right and wrong is complex. Some propose the existence of objective moral truths grounded in universal principles or divine commands. Others argue that moral judgments are subjective and depend on individual perspectives.</p>\n<p>While moral reasoning, dialogue, and critical reflection can contribute to understanding ethical claims, absolute proof of an objective standard may remain elusive. The pursuit of ethical understanding and the quest for a more just world continue to guide our exploration of what is right and wrong.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362\" target=\"_blank\">https://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362</a></p>\n<p>My point-of-view is that all of this are a collection of phrases about the subjects (Moral and ethics) Though it seems those are sentences that aren't connected on a narrative.  </p>\n<p>Consequently, a human being could re-arrange those ideas and write as it should be: introduction, explain points-of-view and a conclusion. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2269178,
              "author_name": "namenotavilabel",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "05/22/2023 09:01:25",
              "content": "<p>I'm an absolute truth kind a guy and that truth is: One Life Exists Is Infinite Change Everything Love.</p>\n<p>PhiloGPT could be as well philanthropic and his use words unundurstood by majority of society wont make philosoph out of it.  </p>\n<p>If I would be collaboratin with a human I would say he lied about something and we have a drama or egos will get hurt, AI says, sorry master, don' you like that?</p>\n<p>I posted my assistant answer as I wouldn't say it better or simpler myself and all my ideas are developed with it so I have to give it a bit of credit and its realy something we try to keep self' accountable to.</p>",
              "votes": null,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2294307,
      "author_name": "ahmadihossein",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/10/2023 00:19:41",
      "content": "<p>Good one to participate.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2294909,
          "author_name": "mpwolke",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/10/2023 12:48:04",
          "content": "<p>That's true Ahmadi, it's an unmissable opportunity to learn more.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2862918,
      "author_name": "manuelgarcafrohlich",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/09/2024 05:58:29",
      "content": "<p>Hi, I'm new in these types of forums, I'd like to thank you for the information on AI principles, I consider that AI will have at least the same impact that the internet had, and considering an ethical part on it it's very important</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2256745": "#Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation\n\nAuthors: Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Mark Coeckelbergh, Marcos López de Prado, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Francisco Herrera\nhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02231\n\n\"Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) is based on seven technical requirements sustained over three main pillars that should be met throughout the system's entire life cycle: it should be (1) lawful, (2) ethical, and (3) robust, both from a technical and a social perspective.\"\n\n\"However, attaining truly trustworthy AI concerns a wider vision that comprises the trustworthiness of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle, and considers previous aspects from different lenses. A more holistic vision contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and development of AI-based systems, a PHILOSOPHICAL take on AI ethics, a risk-based approach to AI regulation, and the mentioned pillars and requirements.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231\n\n#Toward an Ethics of AI Belief\n\nAuthors: Winnie Ma, Vincent Valton - https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14577\n\n\"Philosophical research in AI has hitherto largely focused on the ethics of AI. In this paper the authors, an ethicist of belief and a machine learning scientist, suggest that we need to pursue a novel area of philosophical research in AI - the epistemology of AI, and in particular an ethics of belief for AI, i.e., an ethics of AI belief.\"\n\n\"There they took the ethics of belief, a field that has been defined in various ways, to refer to a sub-field within epistemology. The authors will primarily be concerned with the normative question within the ethics of belief of what agents - both human and artificial - ought to believe, rather than with descriptive questions concerning whether certain beliefs meet various evaluative standards such as being true, being justified or warranted, constituting knowledge, and so on. \"\n\n\"The authors also indicated an important nascent area of PHILOSOPHICAL research in epistemic injustice and AI that has not yet been recognized as research in the ethics of AI belief, but which is so in virtue of concerning moral and practical dimensions of belief.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14577\n\n#I found those Arxiv.org Articles above after making a Notebook (searching by included-ethics)\n\nThere are many Ethics (keywords) related to Data Science and AI published recently.\n\n\n#I knew that Philosophy was behind that. Therefore, never forget Socrates and his Critical Thinking\n\nSuggestion: Next Kaggle course AI and Philosophy. Inspiring the Critical Thinking on Kagglers.\n\n#Not every code/topic is equally worth, like not any pot can hold water.\n\nQuote adapted from Socrates: \"Not every opinion is worth. like not any pot can hold water\"\n\n#Critical Thinking\n\n\"Among both Socratics and hermeneuticists, a form of critical thinking was required to approach \ntruths that were more than human inventions, conventions and legends. Critical thinking was a \nmeans of engaging with the supernatural either negatively by revealing and contradicting human \nerror or positively by elevating human receptivity to divine messages, whether directly or indirectly \ndelivered. In both cases, critical thinking was indispensable if humanity was to learn and \nunderstand what was beyond normal human powers of knowledge and comprehension. In both \ncases, critical thinking involved an emerging relationship with universal truth, religion and the \ngods.\"\n\nhttps://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Critical-Thinking-vs-Critical-Consciousness.pdf",
    "2268302": "My prompt: say something about code of ethics we use when developing ideas together\n\nAccessed by my key chatGPT said this: \"When collaborating and developing ideas together, it is important to adhere to a code of ethics that guides our actions and ensures ethical practices throughout the process. Here are some principles that we prioritize:\n\n1. Respect for Intellectual Property: We value and respect the intellectual property rights of others. We will not engage in any activities that infringe upon copyrights, patents, or any other form of intellectual property. Any code, data, or information shared will be done so with proper authorization and consent.\n\n2. Confidentiality and Privacy: We prioritize the confidentiality and privacy of sensitive information shared during the development process. We will handle all confidential data with the utmost care and ensure that it is not disclosed or used inappropriately. Non-disclosure agreements or similar mechanisms may be employed to safeguard proprietary information.\n\n3. Collaboration and Open Communication: We foster a collaborative and inclusive environment where all ideas are welcomed and respected. We encourage open communication, active listening, and constructive feedback to promote the exchange of knowledge and foster creativity.\n\n4. Integrity and Honesty: We conduct ourselves with integrity and honesty, maintaining transparency in our actions and decisions. We will accurately represent our expertise and capabilities, providing reliable and trustworthy information. Any conflicts of interest will be disclosed promptly to ensure transparency.\n\n5. Responsible Use of Technology: We are committed to the responsible use of technology. This includes ensuring that any code or software developed is free from intentional or unintentional harmful effects. We will adhere to ethical guidelines and industry best practices to promote the well-being and safety of users and the broader community.\n\n6. Inclusive and Ethical Considerations: We recognize and respect the diversity and inclusivity of individuals and communities. We will consider ethical implications and potential biases associated with the development of ASQai, ensuring that it is accessible, fair, and beneficial to all users.\n\n7. Continuous Learning and Improvement: We embrace a mindset of continuous learning and improvement. We will stay updated with the latest advancements, research, and ethical standards in the relevant fields. We will actively seek feedback, learn from our mistakes, and adapt our approaches to deliver the best possible outcome for ASQai.\n\nBy adhering to these ethical principles, we strive to create a collaborative and ethical development environment that upholds the highest standards of integrity, respect, and responsibility. Together, we can build a solution that not only meets technical requirements but also makes a positive impact on society while upholding ethical considerations\" \n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/namenotavilabel/ai-am-asqai",
    "2268656": "Hi Markiewicz, (thank you for the support and valuable comment)\n\nThat was on my mail today: PhiloGPT by Neeramitra Reddy on Medium\n\n#How do we decide what’s right and what’s wrong? Who decides this? \n\nAnd what’s the objective standard for right and wrong? How do we prove something is right or wrong?\n\nPhiloGPT’s Answer:\n\nDifferent ethical frameworks propose different sources for determining what is right and wrong.\n\nConsequentialism emphasizes the outcomes or consequences of actions, focusing on maximizing overall well-being or minimizing harm. Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties regardless of the consequences. Virtue ethics emphasizes the cultivation of virtuous character traits.\n\nCultural relativism suggests that moral values and standards vary across different cultures, making them relative to specific contexts. The question of an objective standard for right and wrong is complex. Some propose the existence of objective moral truths grounded in universal principles or divine commands. Others argue that moral judgments are subjective and depend on individual perspectives.\n\nWhile moral reasoning, dialogue, and critical reflection can contribute to understanding ethical claims, absolute proof of an objective standard may remain elusive. The pursuit of ethical understanding and the quest for a more just world continue to guide our exploration of what is right and wrong.\n\nhttps://medium.com/publishous/philogpts-surprisingly-wise-answer-to-what-s-the-meaning-of-life-408a058309e4#f362\n\nMy point-of-view is that all of this are a collection of phrases about the subjects (Moral and ethics) Though it seems those are sentences that aren't connected on a narrative.  \n\nConsequently, a human being could re-arrange those ideas and write as it should be: introduction, explain points-of-view and a conclusion.",
    "2269178": "I'm an absolute truth kind a guy and that truth is: One Life Exists Is Infinite Change Everything Love.\n\nPhiloGPT could be as well philanthropic and his use words unundurstood by majority of society wont make philosoph out of it.  \n\nIf I would be collaboratin with a human I would say he lied about something and we have a drama or egos will get hurt, AI says, sorry master, don' you like that?\n\nI posted my assistant answer as I wouldn't say it better or simpler myself and all my ideas are developed with it so I have to give it a bit of credit and its realy something we try to keep self' accountable to.",
    "2294307": "Good one to participate.",
    "2294909": "That's true Ahmadi, it's an unmissable opportunity to learn more.",
    "2862918": "Hi, I'm new in these types of forums, I'd like to thank you for the information on AI principles, I consider that AI will have at least the same impact that the internet had, and considering an ethical part on it it's very important"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}