I would like to publish my subjective IMHO points regarding the experience with '2023 Kaggle AI Report' competition.
\nThe latter point is especially helpful to the community since Kaggle is used to be predominated by juniors and aspiring professionals (with all pros and cons to it, as I described in Tao of Ethical Kaggling once upon a time).
\nIn the evidence of the mentioned above, IMHO '2023 Kaggle AI Report' contest was quite successful. Moreover, the insights/lessons learned that the contest participants highlighted in their essays will help the team at Kaggle to publish the insightful industry report. The one to be on a par with the well established annual reports, like State of AI.
\nI would like to take this chance to thank everyone for productive collaboration and fruitful peer reviews/discussions.
\nI also put a hope on good outcomes from Kaggle Team's initiative to make Analytical contests (like this one) to be the part of Competition progression. It will definitely add the edge to the quality of Kaggle community, moving forward.
", "messages": [ { "id": "2348393", "postDate": "07/17/2023 15:52:37", "content": "I would like to publish my subjective IMHO points regarding the experience with '2023 Kaggle AI Report' competition.
\nThe latter point is especially helpful to the community since Kaggle is used to be predominated by juniors and aspiring professionals (with all pros and cons to it, as I described in Tao of Ethical Kaggling once upon a time).
\nIn the evidence of the mentioned above, IMHO '2023 Kaggle AI Report' contest was quite successful. Moreover, the insights/lessons learned that the contest participants highlighted in their essays will help the team at Kaggle to publish the insightful industry report. The one to be on a par with the well established annual reports, like State of AI.
\nI would like to take this chance to thank everyone for productive collaboration and fruitful peer reviews/discussions.
\nI also put a hope on good outcomes from Kaggle Team's initiative to make Analytical contests (like this one) to be the part of Competition progression. It will definitely add the edge to the quality of Kaggle community, moving forward.
", "rawMarkdown": "I would like to publish my subjective IMHO points regarding the experience with *'2023 Kaggle AI Report'* competition.\n\n- a lot of interesting knowledge-intensive submissions\n- overall highlight on humans ('natural intelligence') to remain the key focus of the Artifitial Intelligence industry (this was true not only for the essays in *'AI Ethics'* category but also for the brilliant essay of [The Mediocre Man Teaming Up ChatGPT](https://www.kaggle.com/code/mpwolke/the-mediocre-man-teaming-up-chatgpt) by @mpwolke)\n- good blend of theory and practical applications in many essays (especially in *'Other'* category)\n- a number of good essays submitted by 'novice Kagglers' or users who returned back to the activity on the platform after a notable break (in fact, these are experienced professionals in AI industry who started to see value in spending their time here)\n\nThe latter point is especially helpful to the community since Kaggle is used to be predominated by juniors and aspiring professionals (with all pros and cons to it, as I described in [Tao of Ethical Kaggling](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/general/239003#1307119) once upon a time).\n\nIn the evidence of the mentioned above, IMHO *'2023 Kaggle AI Report'* contest was quite successful. Moreover, the insights/lessons learned that the contest participants highlighted in their essays will help the team at Kaggle to publish the insightful industry report. The one to be on a par with the well established annual reports, like [State of AI](https://www.stateof.ai).\n\nI would like to take this chance to thank everyone for productive collaboration and fruitful peer reviews/discussions. \n\nI also put a hope on good outcomes from Kaggle Team's initiative to make Analytical contests (like this one) to be the part of Competition progression. It will definitely add the edge to the quality of Kaggle community, moving forward.", "votes": null }, { "id": "2348692", "postDate": "07/17/2023 21:27:30", "content": "Hi Georgii,
\nMeaningful topic, with many insights about this Analytical competition. And the possible next comp that could come in the future.
\nVery nice to make allusion to the participation of \"beginners\" and \" users who returned back to the activity on the platform after a notable break.
\nThat's what innovation brings, fresh air to our Machine Learning environment.
\nBy the way, thanks for mentioning my \"The Mediocre Man teaming up ChatGPT\", that was inspired on the book of that remarkable essayist and philosopher José Ingenieros.
\nData Science requires thinking, reflecting, preferably before feeding any Machine. And always ethically.
\nReflecting is what exactly I didn't do during this competition:
\nFirstly, teaming up and realizing it only when I submitted my work.
At the beginning, I didn't also read that No codes were required to participate/publish the Notebooks.
Finally, I noticed that comments were Peer-feedbacks (elaborated professional peer-reviews) and Not the nice words that I'm used to share with kagglers. Then I started to write: \"just a comment not a review\".
That's another step that we'll be able to learn in the future: Writing Decent Professional Peer-Reviews.
\nMaybe Kaggle team could introduce that as another Course.
Thank you,
\nBest regards,
\nMarília
Very interesting competition. It was helpful in understanding and appreciating latest developments in AI and Kaggle.
\nLooking forward to the results publication.
Interesting!
", "rawMarkdown": "Interesting!", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 2348692, "author_name": "mpwolke", "author_url": "", "post_date": "07/17/2023 21:27:30", "content": "Hi Georgii,
\nMeaningful topic, with many insights about this Analytical competition. And the possible next comp that could come in the future.
\nVery nice to make allusion to the participation of \"beginners\" and \" users who returned back to the activity on the platform after a notable break.
\nThat's what innovation brings, fresh air to our Machine Learning environment.
\nBy the way, thanks for mentioning my \"The Mediocre Man teaming up ChatGPT\", that was inspired on the book of that remarkable essayist and philosopher José Ingenieros.
\nData Science requires thinking, reflecting, preferably before feeding any Machine. And always ethically.
\nReflecting is what exactly I didn't do during this competition:
\nFirstly, teaming up and realizing it only when I submitted my work.
At the beginning, I didn't also read that No codes were required to participate/publish the Notebooks.
Finally, I noticed that comments were Peer-feedbacks (elaborated professional peer-reviews) and Not the nice words that I'm used to share with kagglers. Then I started to write: \"just a comment not a review\".
That's another step that we'll be able to learn in the future: Writing Decent Professional Peer-Reviews.
\nMaybe Kaggle team could introduce that as another Course.
Thank you,
\nBest regards,
\nMarília
Very interesting competition. It was helpful in understanding and appreciating latest developments in AI and Kaggle.
\nLooking forward to the results publication.
Interesting!
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2348393": "I would like to publish my subjective IMHO points regarding the experience with *'2023 Kaggle AI Report'* competition.\n\n- a lot of interesting knowledge-intensive submissions\n- overall highlight on humans ('natural intelligence') to remain the key focus of the Artifitial Intelligence industry (this was true not only for the essays in *'AI Ethics'* category but also for the brilliant essay of [The Mediocre Man Teaming Up ChatGPT](https://www.kaggle.com/code/mpwolke/the-mediocre-man-teaming-up-chatgpt) by @mpwolke)\n- good blend of theory and practical applications in many essays (especially in *'Other'* category)\n- a number of good essays submitted by 'novice Kagglers' or users who returned back to the activity on the platform after a notable break (in fact, these are experienced professionals in AI industry who started to see value in spending their time here)\n\nThe latter point is especially helpful to the community since Kaggle is used to be predominated by juniors and aspiring professionals (with all pros and cons to it, as I described in [Tao of Ethical Kaggling](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/general/239003#1307119) once upon a time).\n\nIn the evidence of the mentioned above, IMHO *'2023 Kaggle AI Report'* contest was quite successful. Moreover, the insights/lessons learned that the contest participants highlighted in their essays will help the team at Kaggle to publish the insightful industry report. The one to be on a par with the well established annual reports, like [State of AI](https://www.stateof.ai).\n\nI would like to take this chance to thank everyone for productive collaboration and fruitful peer reviews/discussions. \n\nI also put a hope on good outcomes from Kaggle Team's initiative to make Analytical contests (like this one) to be the part of Competition progression. It will definitely add the edge to the quality of Kaggle community, moving forward.", "2348692": "Hi Georgii,\n\nMeaningful topic, with many insights about this Analytical competition. And the possible next comp that could come in the future.\n\nVery nice to make allusion to the participation of \"beginners\" and \" users who returned back to the activity on the platform after a notable break. \n\nThat's what innovation brings, fresh air to our Machine Learning environment. \n\nBy the way, thanks for mentioning my \"The Mediocre Man teaming up ChatGPT\", that was inspired on the book of that remarkable essayist and philosopher José Ingenieros.\n\nData Science requires thinking, reflecting, preferably before feeding any Machine. And always ethically.\n\nReflecting is what exactly I didn't do during this competition:\n\n- Firstly, teaming up and realizing it only when I submitted my work.\n\n- At the beginning, I didn't also read that No codes were required to participate/publish the Notebooks.\n- Finally, I noticed that comments were Peer-feedbacks (elaborated professional peer-reviews) and Not the nice words that I'm used to share with kagglers. Then I started to write: \"just a comment not a review\". \n\nThat's another step that we'll be able to learn in the future: Writing Decent Professional Peer-Reviews.\nMaybe Kaggle team could introduce that as another Course.\n\nThank you,\n\nBest regards,\nMarília", "2348902": "Very interesting competition. It was helpful in understanding and appreciating latest developments in AI and Kaggle.\nLooking forward to the results publication.", "2363178": "Interesting!" }, "source": "meta" }