As discussed here, this competition is the third in a series. We've rehosted the first one here just for fun. It was a sizeable dataset for the time, but that was also back in 1993! We've also hosted copies of the papers that were published based on that competition.
", "messages": [ { "id": "654210", "postDate": "10/21/2019 15:37:14", "content": "As discussed here, this competition is the third in a series. We've rehosted the first one here just for fun. It was a sizeable dataset for the time, but that was also back in 1993! We've also hosted copies of the papers that were published based on that competition.
", "rawMarkdown": "As [discussed here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/overview/prior-competitions), this competition is the third in a series. We've rehosted [the first one here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) just for fun. It was a sizeable dataset for the time, but that was also back in 1993! We've also hosted copies of the papers that were published based on that competition.", "votes": null }, { "id": "663324", "postDate": "11/01/2019 20:05:28", "content": "Interesting! What was the dominant technique used in the 1993 competition? SVMs or were people already experimenting with ensembling of decision tree models? Or was it something else completely?
", "rawMarkdown": "Interesting! What was the dominant technique used in the 1993 competition? SVMs or were people already experimenting with ensembling of decision tree models? Or was it something else completely?", "votes": null }, { "id": "663331", "postDate": "11/01/2019 20:14:48", "content": "I'm not familiar with the details of the outcome, but I would expect that the resulting papers (posted to https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) have more information.
", "rawMarkdown": "I'm not familiar with the details of the outcome, but I would expect that the resulting papers (posted to https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) have more information.", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 663324, "author_name": "carlolepelaars", "author_url": "", "post_date": "11/01/2019 20:05:28", "content": "Interesting! What was the dominant technique used in the 1993 competition? SVMs or were people already experimenting with ensembling of decision tree models? Or was it something else completely?
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 663331, "author_name": "sohier", "author_url": "", "post_date": "11/01/2019 20:14:48", "content": "I'm not familiar with the details of the outcome, but I would expect that the resulting papers (posted to https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) have more information.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "654210": "As [discussed here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/overview/prior-competitions), this competition is the third in a series. We've rehosted [the first one here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) just for fun. It was a sizeable dataset for the time, but that was also back in 1993! We've also hosted copies of the papers that were published based on that competition.", "663324": "Interesting! What was the dominant technique used in the 1993 competition? SVMs or were people already experimenting with ensembling of decision tree models? Or was it something else completely?", "663331": "I'm not familiar with the details of the outcome, but I would expect that the resulting papers (posted to https://www.kaggle.com/c/great-energy-predictor-shootout-i/data) have more information." }, "source": "meta" }