{
  "id": 119510,
  "title": "Should we replace the site 4 leak into our submission？",
  "url": "/competitions/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119510",
  "author_name": "清水河小栗旬",
  "post_date": "2019-11-29T06:25:09.132000",
  "votes": 0,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>As discussed here <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429</a>. Or will the messy site 4 leak still not be used to score on private LB?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 684018,
      "postDate": "2019-11-29T06:25:09.133Z",
      "content": "<p>As discussed here <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429</a>. Or will the messy site 4 leak still not be used to score on private LB?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "As discussed here [https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429](https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429). Or will the messy site 4 leak still not be used to score on private LB?"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "684018": "As discussed here [https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429](https://www.kaggle.com/c/ashrae-energy-prediction/discussion/119209#latest-683429). Or will the messy site 4 leak still not be used to score on private LB?"
  }
}