{
  "id": 402474,
  "title": "Are these line graphs?",
  "url": "/competitions/benetech-making-graphs-accessible/discussion/402474",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-04-18T14:51:06.812141300Z",
  "votes": 2,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Apologies if this was covered somewhere else, but the annotations categorize the silhouetted bar graphs as line graphs . Is this an error, or should we really treat these as line graphs?</p>\n<p>20dab9b77cc9.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fa717ca5c9d65c640b347c1ed79d9e380%2F20dab9b77cc9.jpg?generation=1681829347258922&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"20dab9b77cc9.jpg\"></p>\n<p>140ac1bc7993.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2F88234949f7647854aeefdae78c2a42b7%2F140ac1bc7993.jpg?generation=1681829390620456&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"140ac1bc7993.jpg\"></p>\n<p>7ec413758225.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fd41f3a6fac250b4a955bdd270e305492%2F7ec413758225.jpg?generation=1681829400602950&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"7ec413758225.jpg\"></p>\n<p>(I don't think I need to explain why I think they are bar graphs, but just in case, unlike a line graph where the values are connected to each other by a joining line, the \"line\" in this case outlines a rectangular polygon whose height is the height of the value)</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2225961",
      "postDate": "04/18/2023 14:51:06",
      "content": "<p>Apologies if this was covered somewhere else, but the annotations categorize the silhouetted bar graphs as line graphs . Is this an error, or should we really treat these as line graphs?</p>\n<p>20dab9b77cc9.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fa717ca5c9d65c640b347c1ed79d9e380%2F20dab9b77cc9.jpg?generation=1681829347258922&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"20dab9b77cc9.jpg\"></p>\n<p>140ac1bc7993.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2F88234949f7647854aeefdae78c2a42b7%2F140ac1bc7993.jpg?generation=1681829390620456&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"140ac1bc7993.jpg\"></p>\n<p>7ec413758225.jpg<br>\n<img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fd41f3a6fac250b4a955bdd270e305492%2F7ec413758225.jpg?generation=1681829400602950&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"7ec413758225.jpg\"></p>\n<p>(I don't think I need to explain why I think they are bar graphs, but just in case, unlike a line graph where the values are connected to each other by a joining line, the \"line\" in this case outlines a rectangular polygon whose height is the height of the value)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Apologies if this was covered somewhere else, but the annotations categorize the silhouetted bar graphs as line graphs . Is this an error, or should we really treat these as line graphs?\n\n20dab9b77cc9.jpg\n![20dab9b77cc9.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fa717ca5c9d65c640b347c1ed79d9e380%2F20dab9b77cc9.jpg?generation=1681829347258922&alt=media)\n\n140ac1bc7993.jpg\n![140ac1bc7993.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2F88234949f7647854aeefdae78c2a42b7%2F140ac1bc7993.jpg?generation=1681829390620456&alt=media)\n\n7ec413758225.jpg\n![7ec413758225.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fd41f3a6fac250b4a955bdd270e305492%2F7ec413758225.jpg?generation=1681829400602950&alt=media)\n\n(I don't think I need to explain why I think they are bar graphs, but just in case, unlike a line graph where the values are connected to each other by a joining line, the \"line\" in this case outlines a rectangular polygon whose height is the height of the value)",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2226059",
      "postDate": "04/18/2023 16:05:58",
      "content": "<p>The annotations for the <code>generated</code> graphs haven't been checked with as much thoroughness. (As you can see, these are evidently bar graphs.) The <code>extracted</code> graphs (including the entire test set) have gone through an extra review to make sure all of the annotations are correct.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The annotations for the `generated` graphs haven't been checked with as much thoroughness. (As you can see, these are evidently bar graphs.) The `extracted` graphs (including the entire test set) have gone through an extra review to make sure all of the annotations are correct.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2226060",
      "postDate": "04/18/2023 16:07:49",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for the quick explanation</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for the quick explanation",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2226059,
      "author_name": "ryanholbrook",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "04/18/2023 16:05:58",
      "content": "<p>The annotations for the <code>generated</code> graphs haven't been checked with as much thoroughness. (As you can see, these are evidently bar graphs.) The <code>extracted</code> graphs (including the entire test set) have gone through an extra review to make sure all of the annotations are correct.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2226060,
          "author_name": "nigelhenry",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "04/18/2023 16:07:49",
          "content": "<p>Thanks for the quick explanation</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2225961": "Apologies if this was covered somewhere else, but the annotations categorize the silhouetted bar graphs as line graphs . Is this an error, or should we really treat these as line graphs?\n\n20dab9b77cc9.jpg\n![20dab9b77cc9.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fa717ca5c9d65c640b347c1ed79d9e380%2F20dab9b77cc9.jpg?generation=1681829347258922&alt=media)\n\n140ac1bc7993.jpg\n![140ac1bc7993.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2F88234949f7647854aeefdae78c2a42b7%2F140ac1bc7993.jpg?generation=1681829390620456&alt=media)\n\n7ec413758225.jpg\n![7ec413758225.jpg](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F422095%2Fd41f3a6fac250b4a955bdd270e305492%2F7ec413758225.jpg?generation=1681829400602950&alt=media)\n\n(I don't think I need to explain why I think they are bar graphs, but just in case, unlike a line graph where the values are connected to each other by a joining line, the \"line\" in this case outlines a rectangular polygon whose height is the height of the value)",
    "2226059": "The annotations for the `generated` graphs haven't been checked with as much thoroughness. (As you can see, these are evidently bar graphs.) The `extracted` graphs (including the entire test set) have gone through an extra review to make sure all of the annotations are correct.",
    "2226060": "Thanks for the quick explanation"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}