{
  "id": 23553,
  "title": "Sequential duplicates in test files?",
  "url": "/competitions/bosch-production-line-performance/discussion/23553",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2016-09-10T23:04:55.703Z",
  "votes": 6,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 930,
  "content": "<p>Has anyone noticed sequential duplicate rows in the test datasets? </p>\n\n<p>From a manual inspection (which may be wrong given the size of this data) it looks like Id's 59 and 60 are identical in the three training files.</p>\n\n<p>Has anyone investigated this further or got any thoughts on the significance, if any, of such sequential duplicates?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "135083",
      "postDate": "09/10/2016 23:04:55",
      "content": "<p>Has anyone noticed sequential duplicate rows in the test datasets? </p>\n\n<p>From a manual inspection (which may be wrong given the size of this data) it looks like Id's 59 and 60 are identical in the three training files.</p>\n\n<p>Has anyone investigated this further or got any thoughts on the significance, if any, of such sequential duplicates?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Has anyone noticed sequential duplicate rows in the test datasets? \r\n\r\nFrom a manual inspection (which may be wrong given the size of this data) it looks like Id's 59 and 60 are identical in the three training files.\r\n\r\nHas anyone investigated this further or got any thoughts on the significance, if any, of such sequential duplicates?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "135084",
      "postDate": "09/10/2016 23:20:48",
      "content": "<p>A little more manual checking shows other sequential duplicate Ids, 133 &amp; 134, 171 &amp;172, 266 &amp; 267.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "A little more manual checking shows other sequential duplicate Ids, 133 & 134, 171 &172, 266 & 267.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "135086",
      "postDate": "09/11/2016 00:46:34",
      "content": "<p>Nice catch, although 171 and 172 are not quite duplicates, take a look at the end of the row.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Nice catch, although 171 and 172 are not quite duplicates, take a look at the end of the row.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 135084,
      "author_name": "nigelcarpenter",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/10/2016 23:20:48",
      "content": "<p>A little more manual checking shows other sequential duplicate Ids, 133 &amp; 134, 171 &amp;172, 266 &amp; 267.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 135086,
      "author_name": "davidthaler",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/11/2016 00:46:34",
      "content": "<p>Nice catch, although 171 and 172 are not quite duplicates, take a look at the end of the row.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "135083": "Has anyone noticed sequential duplicate rows in the test datasets? \r\n\r\nFrom a manual inspection (which may be wrong given the size of this data) it looks like Id's 59 and 60 are identical in the three training files.\r\n\r\nHas anyone investigated this further or got any thoughts on the significance, if any, of such sequential duplicates?",
    "135084": "A little more manual checking shows other sequential duplicate Ids, 133 & 134, 171 &172, 266 & 267.",
    "135086": "Nice catch, although 171 and 172 are not quite duplicates, take a look at the end of the row."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}