{
  "id": 24587,
  "title": "failure report II",
  "url": "/competitions/bosch-production-line-performance/discussion/24587",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2016-10-20T08:16:16.783Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 861,
  "content": "<p>Hello. This is what I tried. But I didn't get a good grade(~0.40). What I would have missed. Also, I hope this could help you.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>In case that the processes were duplicated, and the first Id was indicated as 1, the result was LB Score 0.40.</p>\n\n<p>The result was not that different when the whole processes were same or the certain parts of the processes were same.  </p>\n\n<p>It seems that there is a pattern, but it is not enough to get 0.5.</p>\n\n<p>What needs to be supplemented? </p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "140409",
      "postDate": "10/20/2016 08:16:16",
      "content": "<p>Hello. This is what I tried. But I didn't get a good grade(~0.40). What I would have missed. Also, I hope this could help you.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>In case that the processes were duplicated, and the first Id was indicated as 1, the result was LB Score 0.40.</p>\n\n<p>The result was not that different when the whole processes were same or the certain parts of the processes were same.  </p>\n\n<p>It seems that there is a pattern, but it is not enough to get 0.5.</p>\n\n<p>What needs to be supplemented? </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hello. This is what I tried. But I didn't get a good grade(~0.40). What I would have missed. Also, I hope this could help you.\r\n\r\n-----------------------------------------------\r\nIn case that the processes were duplicated, and the first Id was indicated as 1, the result was LB Score 0.40.\r\n\r\nThe result was not that different when the whole processes were same or the certain parts of the processes were same.  \r\n\r\nIt seems that there is a pattern, but it is not enough to get 0.5.\r\n\r\nWhat needs to be supplemented?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "140483",
      "postDate": "10/20/2016 17:38:16",
      "content": "<p>Try reversing the '1' tag (i.e.) Keep the first one as '0' and rest of duplicates as '1'. And tag non-duplicates as well '0'. It would help the classifier learn better. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Try reversing the '1' tag (i.e.) Keep the first one as '0' and rest of duplicates as '1'. And tag non-duplicates as well '0'. It would help the classifier learn better.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "141134",
      "postDate": "10/25/2016 11:17:10",
      "content": "<p>Thanks PrakashSubedi. \nI do as you tell me but it doesn&#8217;t work well.  Maybe this is not magic feature. &#12640;&#12640; \n(Or my mistake?) </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks PrakashSubedi. \r\nI do as you tell me but it doesn’t work well.  Maybe this is not magic feature. ㅠㅠ \r\n(Or my mistake?)",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 140483,
      "author_name": "gullu39",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/20/2016 17:38:16",
      "content": "<p>Try reversing the '1' tag (i.e.) Keep the first one as '0' and rest of duplicates as '1'. And tag non-duplicates as well '0'. It would help the classifier learn better. </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 141134,
      "author_name": "niks2000",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/25/2016 11:17:10",
      "content": "<p>Thanks PrakashSubedi. \nI do as you tell me but it doesn&#8217;t work well.  Maybe this is not magic feature. &#12640;&#12640; \n(Or my mistake?) </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "140409": "Hello. This is what I tried. But I didn't get a good grade(~0.40). What I would have missed. Also, I hope this could help you.\r\n\r\n-----------------------------------------------\r\nIn case that the processes were duplicated, and the first Id was indicated as 1, the result was LB Score 0.40.\r\n\r\nThe result was not that different when the whole processes were same or the certain parts of the processes were same.  \r\n\r\nIt seems that there is a pattern, but it is not enough to get 0.5.\r\n\r\nWhat needs to be supplemented?",
    "140483": "Try reversing the '1' tag (i.e.) Keep the first one as '0' and rest of duplicates as '1'. And tag non-duplicates as well '0'. It would help the classifier learn better.",
    "141134": "Thanks PrakashSubedi. \r\nI do as you tell me but it doesn’t work well.  Maybe this is not magic feature. ㅠㅠ \r\n(Or my mistake?)"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}