{
  "id": 403320,
  "title": "Obsolete IDs",
  "url": "/competitions/cafa-5-protein-function-prediction/discussion/403320",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-04-22T12:36:59.731218900Z",
  "votes": 6,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>This protein ID A2RUG3, present only in the test set, is now obsolete in UniProt. I suppose we can eliminate such ids from our predictions? A similar situation for C0HM68, which is not found but stistill present at QuickGO (<a href=\"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68)\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68)</a>.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2230502",
      "postDate": "04/22/2023 12:36:59",
      "content": "<p>This protein ID A2RUG3, present only in the test set, is now obsolete in UniProt. I suppose we can eliminate such ids from our predictions? A similar situation for C0HM68, which is not found but stistill present at QuickGO (<a href=\"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68)\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68)</a>.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "This protein ID A2RUG3, present only in the test set, is now obsolete in UniProt. I suppose we can eliminate such ids from our predictions? A similar situation for C0HM68, which is not found but stistill present at QuickGO (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68).",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2232787",
      "postDate": "04/24/2023 15:59:32",
      "content": "<p>We strongly recommend not excluding any IDs while generating predictions.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "We strongly recommend not excluding any IDs while generating predictions.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2232832",
      "postDate": "04/24/2023 16:54:13",
      "content": "<p>Hi, can you please elaborate more on this? For example, C9J442, A8MYX2, A2RUG3, A6NEY3 (present only in the test set) have been deleted. What is the chance that these ids will get new annotations? These two ids (again present only in the test set) do not appear in UniProt but have annotations in quick-go : C0HM68, C0HLS4. Odd isn't it? </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi, can you please elaborate more on this? For example, C9J442, A8MYX2, A2RUG3, A6NEY3 (present only in the test set) have been deleted. What is the chance that these ids will get new annotations? These two ids (again present only in the test set) do not appear in UniProt but have annotations in quick-go : C0HM68, C0HLS4. Odd isn't it?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2235221",
      "postDate": "04/25/2023 20:35:25",
      "content": "<p>I suggest you follow the advice and include everything. The hosts may or may not know at this point what will be available in 6 months. It doesn't strike me as undue hardship if we predict a handful of proteins that are in the end excluded from analysis.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I suggest you follow the advice and include everything. The hosts may or may not know at this point what will be available in 6 months. It doesn't strike me as undue hardship if we predict a handful of proteins that are in the end excluded from analysis.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2232787,
      "author_name": "parnaljoshi",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "04/24/2023 15:59:32",
      "content": "<p>We strongly recommend not excluding any IDs while generating predictions.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2232832,
          "author_name": "mtinti",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "04/24/2023 16:54:13",
          "content": "<p>Hi, can you please elaborate more on this? For example, C9J442, A8MYX2, A2RUG3, A6NEY3 (present only in the test set) have been deleted. What is the chance that these ids will get new annotations? These two ids (again present only in the test set) do not appear in UniProt but have annotations in quick-go : C0HM68, C0HLS4. Odd isn't it? </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2235221,
              "author_name": "tilii7",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "04/25/2023 20:35:25",
              "content": "<p>I suggest you follow the advice and include everything. The hosts may or may not know at this point what will be available in 6 months. It doesn't strike me as undue hardship if we predict a handful of proteins that are in the end excluded from analysis.</p>",
              "votes": null,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2230502": "This protein ID A2RUG3, present only in the test set, is now obsolete in UniProt. I suppose we can eliminate such ids from our predictions? A similar situation for C0HM68, which is not found but stistill present at QuickGO (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?geneProductId=C0HM68).",
    "2232787": "We strongly recommend not excluding any IDs while generating predictions.",
    "2232832": "Hi, can you please elaborate more on this? For example, C9J442, A8MYX2, A2RUG3, A6NEY3 (present only in the test set) have been deleted. What is the chance that these ids will get new annotations? These two ids (again present only in the test set) do not appear in UniProt but have annotations in quick-go : C0HM68, C0HLS4. Odd isn't it?",
    "2235221": "I suggest you follow the advice and include everything. The hosts may or may not know at this point what will be available in 6 months. It doesn't strike me as undue hardship if we predict a handful of proteins that are in the end excluded from analysis."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}