{
  "id": 100139,
  "title": "Is it really useful?",
  "url": "/competitions/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/100139",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2019-07-16T19:13:32.969779600Z",
  "votes": 3,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I don't know. It is said, that 'ideal score\" is near -20.7 you got it if you, lets say, do quantum calculations and got exact results, which, I believe, is the only right way. \nBut even the best score is quite far from -20. Does it mean the whole idea using ML is wrong?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "577550",
      "postDate": "07/16/2019 19:13:32",
      "content": "<p>I don't know. It is said, that 'ideal score\" is near -20.7 you got it if you, lets say, do quantum calculations and got exact results, which, I believe, is the only right way. \nBut even the best score is quite far from -20. Does it mean the whole idea using ML is wrong?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I don't know. It is said, that 'ideal score\" is near -20.7 you got it if you, lets say, do quantum calculations and got exact results, which, I believe, is the only right way. \nBut even the best score is quite far from -20. Does it mean the whole idea using ML is wrong?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "577568",
      "postDate": "07/16/2019 19:47:42",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"/serg132003\">@serg132003</a> From what I understood, the '-20.7' score has nothing to do with the quality of some quantum calculations. It is the theoretical minimum score obtained when evaluating the predictions, by setting the floor of MAE for any group to 1e-9 (to avoid Log(0)). in other words : Log(1e-9) = -20.7232</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "serg132003 From what I understood, the '-20.7' score has nothing to do with the quality of some quantum calculations. It is the theoretical minimum score obtained when evaluating the predictions, by setting the floor of MAE for any group to 1e-9 (to avoid Log(0)). in other words : Log(1e-9) = -20.7232",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "577896",
      "postDate": "07/17/2019 07:12:03",
      "content": "<p>The organizer commented he would be very excited if any solution reached -3\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The organizer commented he would be very excited if any solution reached -3\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "580510",
      "postDate": "07/20/2019 08:58:27",
      "content": "<p>Seems you'll make organizers very excited soon!</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Seems you'll make organizers very excited soon!",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 577568,
      "author_name": "jakil38",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/16/2019 19:47:42",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"/serg132003\">@serg132003</a> From what I understood, the '-20.7' score has nothing to do with the quality of some quantum calculations. It is the theoretical minimum score obtained when evaluating the predictions, by setting the floor of MAE for any group to 1e-9 (to avoid Log(0)). in other words : Log(1e-9) = -20.7232</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 577896,
      "author_name": "antorsae",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/17/2019 07:12:03",
      "content": "<p>The organizer commented he would be very excited if any solution reached -3\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312</a></p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 580510,
          "author_name": "cpmpml",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "07/20/2019 08:58:27",
          "content": "<p>Seems you'll make organizers very excited soon!</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "577550": "I don't know. It is said, that 'ideal score\" is near -20.7 you got it if you, lets say, do quantum calculations and got exact results, which, I believe, is the only right way. \nBut even the best score is quite far from -20. Does it mean the whole idea using ML is wrong?",
    "577568": "serg132003 From what I understood, the '-20.7' score has nothing to do with the quality of some quantum calculations. It is the theoretical minimum score obtained when evaluating the predictions, by setting the floor of MAE for any group to 1e-9 (to avoid Log(0)). in other words : Log(1e-9) = -20.7232",
    "577896": "The organizer commented he would be very excited if any solution reached -3\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/98375#569312",
    "580510": "Seems you'll make organizers very excited soon!"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}