I noticed late submission button active. Until the test data available to public is there way to submit the solutions? using new methods? I think it should be encouraged for this particular challange, so that science grows with new methods, algorithms by community participations..\nkarthikeyan
", "messages": [ { "id": "616499", "postDate": "09/03/2019 07:25:25", "content": "I noticed late submission button active. Until the test data available to public is there way to submit the solutions? using new methods? I think it should be encouraged for this particular challange, so that science grows with new methods, algorithms by community participations..\nkarthikeyan
", "rawMarkdown": "I noticed late submission button active. Until the test data available to public is there way to submit the solutions? using new methods? I think it should be encouraged for this particular challange, so that science grows with new methods, algorithms by community participations..\nkarthikeyan", "votes": null }, { "id": "616523", "postDate": "09/03/2019 07:55:56", "content": "Test data usually isn't made available. But you can train models and submit predictions for late submission.
", "rawMarkdown": "Test data usually isn't made available. But you can train models and submit predictions for late submission.", "votes": null }, { "id": "616607", "postDate": "09/03/2019 09:29:03", "content": "where to get predicted (top 1) values? is there way to find the actual computation done on 'atom-pair' that is equivalent to 'Ramsey Terms: FC, SD,MSO, PSO ' dipole moment, Energy.. that is not given to test set (if the test set is diverse)..
\n\nGoing through \" Calculation and analysis of NMR spin–spin coupling constants Dieter Cremera et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2007, 9, 2791–2816 \" and finding equivalent ones from just interatomic distances for the test set and type of atoms involved is bit difficult .. Y=MX+C where Y=SCC, X=atom-pair info. M & C variation is correlation with original test set at 71% ? what about rest 29% .. I am happy to know that you are in 8th in this competition.. Heartiest congratulations.. Brovo.\nkarthi
", "rawMarkdown": "where to get predicted (top 1) values? is there way to find the actual computation done on 'atom-pair' that is equivalent to 'Ramsey Terms: FC, SD,MSO, PSO ' dipole moment, Energy.. that is not given to test set (if the test set is diverse)..\n\nGoing through \" Calculation and analysis of NMR spin–spin coupling constants Dieter Cremera et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2007, 9, 2791–2816 \" and finding equivalent ones from just interatomic distances for the test set and type of atoms involved is bit difficult .. Y=MX+C where Y=SCC, X=atom-pair info. M & C variation is correlation with original test set at 71% ? what about rest 29% .. I am happy to know that you are in 8th in this competition.. Heartiest congratulations.. Brovo.\nkarthi", "votes": null }, { "id": "616704", "postDate": "09/03/2019 11:39:09", "content": "I don't think anyone will share any additional data. You can only calculate/train by yourself.
", "rawMarkdown": "I don't think anyone will share any additional data. You can only calculate/train by yourself.", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 616523, "author_name": "artgor", "author_url": "", "post_date": "09/03/2019 07:55:56", "content": "Test data usually isn't made available. But you can train models and submit predictions for late submission.
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 616607, "author_name": "karthincl", "author_url": "", "post_date": "09/03/2019 09:29:03", "content": "where to get predicted (top 1) values? is there way to find the actual computation done on 'atom-pair' that is equivalent to 'Ramsey Terms: FC, SD,MSO, PSO ' dipole moment, Energy.. that is not given to test set (if the test set is diverse)..
\n\nGoing through \" Calculation and analysis of NMR spin–spin coupling constants Dieter Cremera et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2007, 9, 2791–2816 \" and finding equivalent ones from just interatomic distances for the test set and type of atoms involved is bit difficult .. Y=MX+C where Y=SCC, X=atom-pair info. M & C variation is correlation with original test set at 71% ? what about rest 29% .. I am happy to know that you are in 8th in this competition.. Heartiest congratulations.. Brovo.\nkarthi
", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 616704, "author_name": "artgor", "author_url": "", "post_date": "09/03/2019 11:39:09", "content": "I don't think anyone will share any additional data. You can only calculate/train by yourself.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "616499": "I noticed late submission button active. Until the test data available to public is there way to submit the solutions? using new methods? I think it should be encouraged for this particular challange, so that science grows with new methods, algorithms by community participations..\nkarthikeyan", "616523": "Test data usually isn't made available. But you can train models and submit predictions for late submission.", "616607": "where to get predicted (top 1) values? is there way to find the actual computation done on 'atom-pair' that is equivalent to 'Ramsey Terms: FC, SD,MSO, PSO ' dipole moment, Energy.. that is not given to test set (if the test set is diverse)..\n\nGoing through \" Calculation and analysis of NMR spin–spin coupling constants Dieter Cremera et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2007, 9, 2791–2816 \" and finding equivalent ones from just interatomic distances for the test set and type of atoms involved is bit difficult .. Y=MX+C where Y=SCC, X=atom-pair info. M & C variation is correlation with original test set at 71% ? what about rest 29% .. I am happy to know that you are in 8th in this competition.. Heartiest congratulations.. Brovo.\nkarthi", "616704": "I don't think anyone will share any additional data. You can only calculate/train by yourself." }, "source": "meta" }