{
  "id": 99441,
  "title": "Interview I have been waiting for",
  "url": "/competitions/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2019-07-11T11:09:42.134066600Z",
  "votes": -11,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Interview with Abhishek Thakur | Worlds First Triple Grandmaster | Kaggle \nAbhishek's first interview after becoming 3X GM\n<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0</a></p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "572750",
      "postDate": "07/11/2019 11:09:42",
      "content": "<p>Interview with Abhishek Thakur | Worlds First Triple Grandmaster | Kaggle \nAbhishek's first interview after becoming 3X GM\n<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Interview with Abhishek Thakur | Worlds First Triple Grandmaster | Kaggle \nAbhishek's first interview after becoming 3X GM\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "572909",
      "postDate": "07/11/2019 15:04:43",
      "content": "<p>Why you created multiple topics?\n- <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441</a>\n- <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442</a></p>\n\n<p>We all glad for Abhishek - it's a great achievement, but why are you (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success? I can understand one topic, but topic with more info (how you leaned from him / what kernels were great from your point of view / team experience / mentoring / work together etc). But twice with just a single link - I just don't think this is good behavior example.  </p>\n\n<p>PS You didn't even included his account.\nPSS <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek\">https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek</a> ( <a href=\"/abhishek\">@abhishek</a> )</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Why you created multiple topics?\n- https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441\n- https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442\n\nWe all glad for Abhishek - it's a great achievement, but why are you (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success? I can understand one topic, but topic with more info (how you leaned from him / what kernels were great from your point of view / team experience / mentoring / work together etc). But twice with just a single link - I just don't think this is good behavior example.  \n\nPS You didn't even included his account.\nPSS https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek ( @abhishek )",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "572973",
      "postDate": "07/11/2019 15:54:36",
      "content": "<p>Well that's your way to look at that. </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Why you created multiple topics?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>From my point of view I wanted to spread his ideas and experiences to a wider audience so that people who are in a different competition could also learn from it. If I get hundred downvotes on my duplicated topic and if there is one person who has found it useful and would have missed otherwise the reason being posted in another competition. I would consider it a success irrespective of downvotes.</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>parasyting on his success</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Don't you think the person who has given the interview will not be posting it on their own? It's others who find it useful and share among the community. </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>PS You didn't even included his account.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Is it not common sense to not to send him unnecessary notification? Imagine if you are a GM and 10 or 100 people mentioned you in their comments. Will you just keep on reading all those unnecessary comments you have nothing to do?</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>(sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>This is called a paradox. If you are sorry don't use the strong language and vice-versa. Period!</p>\n\n<p><strong>I will upvote you and leave it here, I feel life is too short to engage in such type of conversation beyond this point, there is so much work needs to be done in science. Good luck for the competition and Peace out.</strong></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Well that's your way to look at that. \n\n&gt; Why you created multiple topics?\n\nFrom my point of view I wanted to spread his ideas and experiences to a wider audience so that people who are in a different competition could also learn from it. If I get hundred downvotes on my duplicated topic and if there is one person who has found it useful and would have missed otherwise the reason being posted in another competition. I would consider it a success irrespective of downvotes.\n\n&gt; parasyting on his success\n\nDon't you think the person who has given the interview will not be posting it on their own? It's others who find it useful and share among the community. \n\n&gt; PS You didn't even included his account.\n\nIs it not common sense to not to send him unnecessary notification? Imagine if you are a GM and 10 or 100 people mentioned you in their comments. Will you just keep on reading all those unnecessary comments you have nothing to do?\n\n&gt; (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success?\n\nThis is called a paradox. If you are sorry don't use the strong language and vice-versa. Period!\n\n**I will upvote you and leave it here, I feel life is too short to engage in such type of conversation beyond this point, there is so much work needs to be done in science. Good luck for the competition and Peace out.**",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 572909,
      "author_name": "kyakovlev",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/11/2019 15:04:43",
      "content": "<p>Why you created multiple topics?\n- <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441</a>\n- <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442</a></p>\n\n<p>We all glad for Abhishek - it's a great achievement, but why are you (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success? I can understand one topic, but topic with more info (how you leaned from him / what kernels were great from your point of view / team experience / mentoring / work together etc). But twice with just a single link - I just don't think this is good behavior example.  </p>\n\n<p>PS You didn't even included his account.\nPSS <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek\">https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek</a> ( <a href=\"/abhishek\">@abhishek</a> )</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 572973,
          "author_name": "cyberia",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "07/11/2019 15:54:36",
          "content": "<p>Well that's your way to look at that. </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Why you created multiple topics?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>From my point of view I wanted to spread his ideas and experiences to a wider audience so that people who are in a different competition could also learn from it. If I get hundred downvotes on my duplicated topic and if there is one person who has found it useful and would have missed otherwise the reason being posted in another competition. I would consider it a success irrespective of downvotes.</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>parasyting on his success</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Don't you think the person who has given the interview will not be posting it on their own? It's others who find it useful and share among the community. </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>PS You didn't even included his account.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Is it not common sense to not to send him unnecessary notification? Imagine if you are a GM and 10 or 100 people mentioned you in their comments. Will you just keep on reading all those unnecessary comments you have nothing to do?</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>(sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>This is called a paradox. If you are sorry don't use the strong language and vice-versa. Period!</p>\n\n<p><strong>I will upvote you and leave it here, I feel life is too short to engage in such type of conversation beyond this point, there is so much work needs to be done in science. Good luck for the competition and Peace out.</strong></p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "572750": "Interview with Abhishek Thakur | Worlds First Triple Grandmaster | Kaggle \nAbhishek's first interview after becoming 3X GM\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lniZVqRLA0",
    "572909": "Why you created multiple topics?\n- https://www.kaggle.com/c/champs-scalar-coupling/discussion/99441\n- https://www.kaggle.com/c/aptos2019-blindness-detection/discussion/99442\n\nWe all glad for Abhishek - it's a great achievement, but why are you (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success? I can understand one topic, but topic with more info (how you leaned from him / what kernels were great from your point of view / team experience / mentoring / work together etc). But twice with just a single link - I just don't think this is good behavior example.  \n\nPS You didn't even included his account.\nPSS https://www.kaggle.com/abhishek ( @abhishek )",
    "572973": "Well that's your way to look at that. \n\n&gt; Why you created multiple topics?\n\nFrom my point of view I wanted to spread his ideas and experiences to a wider audience so that people who are in a different competition could also learn from it. If I get hundred downvotes on my duplicated topic and if there is one person who has found it useful and would have missed otherwise the reason being posted in another competition. I would consider it a success irrespective of downvotes.\n\n&gt; parasyting on his success\n\nDon't you think the person who has given the interview will not be posting it on their own? It's others who find it useful and share among the community. \n\n&gt; PS You didn't even included his account.\n\nIs it not common sense to not to send him unnecessary notification? Imagine if you are a GM and 10 or 100 people mentioned you in their comments. Will you just keep on reading all those unnecessary comments you have nothing to do?\n\n&gt; (sorry for such strong word) parasyting on his success?\n\nThis is called a paradox. If you are sorry don't use the strong language and vice-versa. Period!\n\n**I will upvote you and leave it here, I feel life is too short to engage in such type of conversation beyond this point, there is so much work needs to be done in science. Good luck for the competition and Peace out.**"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}