{
  "id": 230965,
  "title": "Training Data Missing Data References?",
  "url": "/competitions/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/230965",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2021-04-06T10:43:13.605362300Z",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hi,<br>\nFor the training ID \"000efc17-13d8-433d-8f62-a3932fe4f3b8\" I can find two entries in the train.csv file. The cleaned labels are \"adni\"  and \"alzheimer s disease neuroimaging initiative adni\". In the text (fourth line of the abstract) there is reference to the NACC dataset (\"we used multimodal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.\") </p>\n<p>If this is just inaccurate training data that's fine - it's part of the problem that's been set. I would just like to clarify that this reference should be in train.csv - i.e. there are no criteria that I have missed in my reading of the rules/overview/evaluation.</p>\n<p>Thanks for any feedback.<br>\nPeter.</p>\n<p>P.S. I presume that the test data has been prepared in a similar way - so scores will reflect similarity with the process used rather than the truth of the document's content.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1264657",
      "postDate": "04/06/2021 10:43:13",
      "content": "<p>Hi,<br>\nFor the training ID \"000efc17-13d8-433d-8f62-a3932fe4f3b8\" I can find two entries in the train.csv file. The cleaned labels are \"adni\"  and \"alzheimer s disease neuroimaging initiative adni\". In the text (fourth line of the abstract) there is reference to the NACC dataset (\"we used multimodal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.\") </p>\n<p>If this is just inaccurate training data that's fine - it's part of the problem that's been set. I would just like to clarify that this reference should be in train.csv - i.e. there are no criteria that I have missed in my reading of the rules/overview/evaluation.</p>\n<p>Thanks for any feedback.<br>\nPeter.</p>\n<p>P.S. I presume that the test data has been prepared in a similar way - so scores will reflect similarity with the process used rather than the truth of the document's content.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi,\nFor the training ID \"000efc17-13d8-433d-8f62-a3932fe4f3b8\" I can find two entries in the train.csv file. The cleaned labels are \"adni\"  and \"alzheimer s disease neuroimaging initiative adni\". In the text (fourth line of the abstract) there is reference to the NACC dataset (\"we used multimodal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.\") \n\nIf this is just inaccurate training data that's fine - it's part of the problem that's been set. I would just like to clarify that this reference should be in train.csv - i.e. there are no criteria that I have missed in my reading of the rules/overview/evaluation.\n\nThanks for any feedback.\nPeter.\n\nP.S. I presume that the test data has been prepared in a similar way - so scores will reflect similarity with the process used rather than the truth of the document's content.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1265159",
      "postDate": "04/06/2021 16:55:15",
      "content": "<p>Hi,</p>\n<p>According to this thread the train data is missing labels.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi,\n\nAccording to this thread the train data is missing labels.\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1265248",
      "postDate": "04/06/2021 18:00:30",
      "content": "<p>Aahh. Thank you. I had missed that.<br>\nPeter.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Aahh. Thank you. I had missed that.\nPeter.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1265159,
      "author_name": "sneyderyepes",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "04/06/2021 16:55:15",
      "content": "<p>Hi,</p>\n<p>According to this thread the train data is missing labels.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463</a></p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1265248,
          "author_name": "poluminous",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "04/06/2021 18:00:30",
          "content": "<p>Aahh. Thank you. I had missed that.<br>\nPeter.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1264657": "Hi,\nFor the training ID \"000efc17-13d8-433d-8f62-a3932fe4f3b8\" I can find two entries in the train.csv file. The cleaned labels are \"adni\"  and \"alzheimer s disease neuroimaging initiative adni\". In the text (fourth line of the abstract) there is reference to the NACC dataset (\"we used multimodal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.\") \n\nIf this is just inaccurate training data that's fine - it's part of the problem that's been set. I would just like to clarify that this reference should be in train.csv - i.e. there are no criteria that I have missed in my reading of the rules/overview/evaluation.\n\nThanks for any feedback.\nPeter.\n\nP.S. I presume that the test data has been prepared in a similar way - so scores will reflect similarity with the process used rather than the truth of the document's content.",
    "1265159": "Hi,\n\nAccording to this thread the train data is missing labels.\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/coleridgeinitiative-show-us-the-data/discussion/228463",
    "1265248": "Aahh. Thank you. I had missed that.\nPeter."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}