# Evaluation

Your objective is to develop a method for recommending career advice questions to relevant volunteers that are most likely to answer them.

## A valid submission will include: 

 - **Kernel Notebook**: At least one kernel containing your method that  recommends questions to volunteers. All kernels submitted must be made public on or before the submission deadline to be eligible. If submitting as a team, all team members must be listed as collaborators on all kernels submitted. 

## Criteria for Measuring Solutions

- **Performance**: How well does the solution match questions to volunteers that would be most likely to answer? CareerVillage.org will not be able to live-test every submission, so a strong entry will clearly articulate why it is effective.

- **Easy to implement**: The CareerVillage.org team wants to put the winning submissions to work quickly.  A good entry will be well documented and easy to test in production.
 
- **Extensibility**: In the future, CareerVillage.org aims to add more data features. The best submissions will make it easy to add new features and data not presently available.



Submissions are scored on these major sections:

 - Quality of documentation and implementation feasibility (0-5) 
 - Quality of data insights and overall communication (0-5) 
 - Quality of model, model features, and model insights (0-5) 
 - Recommendations for future explorations and implementations (0-5)

Each section will be scored on a scale of 0-5 and then summed for each judge. The scale of summed scores is 0-20 where 20 is the highest score. Final scores will be the average of the summed scores from each judge.