{
  "id": 92153,
  "title": "Item field",
  "url": "/competitions/dota-2-prediction/discussion/92153",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2019-05-13T20:14:59.367590500Z",
  "votes": 2,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>In the train dataset, the rN_items is described as number of itens in the data description. Is it really number of itens or the code of the highest grade item purchased? As the code number rises by the grade of the item in the item_name json.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "530848",
      "postDate": "05/13/2019 20:14:59",
      "content": "<p>In the train dataset, the rN_items is described as number of itens in the data description. Is it really number of itens or the code of the highest grade item purchased? As the code number rises by the grade of the item in the item_name json.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "In the train dataset, the rN_items is described as number of itens in the data description. Is it really number of itens or the code of the highest grade item purchased? As the code number rises by the grade of the item in the item_name json.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "532590",
      "postDate": "05/17/2019 10:38:59",
      "content": "<p>It is the number of items purchased. Notice that the ids for the \"normal\" items in the *item_ids.json* go as high as 277.  Meanwhile, for example for r1_items, the maximum is 44, the mean is 7.65. \n<strong>It is really the number of items purchased.</strong></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "It is the number of items purchased. Notice that the ids for the \"normal\" items in the *item_ids.json* go as high as 277.  Meanwhile, for example for r1_items, the maximum is 44, the mean is 7.65. \n**It is really the number of items purchased.**",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "532780",
      "postDate": "05/17/2019 17:26:41",
      "content": "<p>Then what is the point of adding item_ids.json if we don't have item ids in our datasets? Or may be I missed something 🤔 </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Then what is the point of adding item_ids.json if we don't have item ids in our datasets? Or may be I missed something 🤔",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "534028",
      "postDate": "05/20/2019 13:32:52",
      "content": "<p>You didn't. There was no point. We planned to supply data that used that field, but in the uploaded final version of the competition there is no real use for that particular file. It is a red herring. To avoid further confusion, we've removed that file and any mention of it. Except for this discussion of course.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "You didn't. There was no point. We planned to supply data that used that field, but in the uploaded final version of the competition there is no real use for that particular file. It is a red herring. To avoid further confusion, we've removed that file and any mention of it. Except for this discussion of course.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 532590,
      "author_name": "vidosits",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "05/17/2019 10:38:59",
      "content": "<p>It is the number of items purchased. Notice that the ids for the \"normal\" items in the *item_ids.json* go as high as 277.  Meanwhile, for example for r1_items, the maximum is 44, the mean is 7.65. \n<strong>It is really the number of items purchased.</strong></p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 532780,
          "author_name": "grazder",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/17/2019 17:26:41",
          "content": "<p>Then what is the point of adding item_ids.json if we don't have item ids in our datasets? Or may be I missed something 🤔 </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 534028,
          "author_name": "vidosits",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/20/2019 13:32:52",
          "content": "<p>You didn't. There was no point. We planned to supply data that used that field, but in the uploaded final version of the competition there is no real use for that particular file. It is a red herring. To avoid further confusion, we've removed that file and any mention of it. Except for this discussion of course.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "530848": "In the train dataset, the rN_items is described as number of itens in the data description. Is it really number of itens or the code of the highest grade item purchased? As the code number rises by the grade of the item in the item_name json.",
    "532590": "It is the number of items purchased. Notice that the ids for the \"normal\" items in the *item_ids.json* go as high as 277.  Meanwhile, for example for r1_items, the maximum is 44, the mean is 7.65. \n**It is really the number of items purchased.**",
    "532780": "Then what is the point of adding item_ids.json if we don't have item ids in our datasets? Or may be I missed something 🤔",
    "534028": "You didn't. There was no point. We planned to supply data that used that field, but in the uploaded final version of the competition there is no real use for that particular file. It is a red herring. To avoid further confusion, we've removed that file and any mention of it. Except for this discussion of course."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}