{
  "id": 582242,
  "title": "45th Place Solution",
  "content": "<h1>Acknowledgements and Reflections on the Competition</h1>\n<p>First of all, I would like to express my <strong>sincere gratitude to Kaggle</strong> for organizing this competition, which provided an excellent opportunity to expand my knowledge and skills.  <br>\nI would also like to thank Kawsar Hossain <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/kawchar85\" target=\"_blank\">@kawchar85</a> for his insightful post  (<a href=\"url\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drawing-with-llms/discussion/576181#3207144</a>), which served as a significant source of inspiration for my work.</p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Competition Dynamics</h2>\n<p>In the final week of the competition, the dynamics on the leaderboard <strong>intensified considerably</strong>, leading me to suspect that a novel state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-image model might have been discovered by some participants.</p>\n<p>Consequently, I conducted a thorough review of recent publications on <strong>arXiv</strong>, <strong>Hugging Face</strong>, and <strong>OpenReview</strong>, yet found no substantial breakthroughs.  <br>\nThis prompted me to re-evaluate my strategy and focus on <strong>optimizing my existing solution</strong>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F11102957%2F47a97fe6b9b1d7b167851a19364db6df%2FP1.jpg?generation=1748576315051200&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"Figure 1\"></p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Key Experimental Findings</h2>\n<p>Below is a summary of key experimental findings from the competition:</p>\n<h3>1. <strong>SDXL Base / Turbo and SDXL Hyper</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>User-friendly</strong> and require minimal parameter tuning.</li>\n<li>Facilitate a <strong>lower barrier to entry</strong>.</li>\n<li>I adopted this approach during the mid-stage, which initially achieved a <strong>high ranking</strong> but declined towards the end.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>2. <strong>SANA 1.5</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Performs well with <strong>straightforward parameter settings</strong>, yielding relatively high scores.</li>\n<li>I hypothesize that <strong>more advanced hyperparameter optimization</strong> could further improve performance; however, time constraints precluded additional exploration.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>3. <strong>DMD2 (4-step UNet generation)</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>One of my final choices.</li>\n<li>By utilizing the <strong>demo code provided in the Model Card</strong>, I achieved a high score with minimal effort.</li>\n<li><strong>Simple parameter adjustments</strong> resulted in an approximate <strong>0.02 improvement</strong>.</li>\n<li>Further fine-tuning could yield even better results.</li>\n<li><strong>Demonstrated considerable stability</strong>.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>4. <strong>SDXL Flash</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Also among my final submissions.</li>\n<li>Achieved a score of <strong>0.67 on the public leaderboard</strong> using the demo code.</li>\n<li><strong>Basic parameter tuning</strong> allowed for further improvements.</li>\n<li><strong>Limitation:</strong> Instability—identical configurations often produced significantly different results across multiple submissions.</li>\n</ul>\n<hr>\n<h2>Summary</h2>\n<p>Throughout the competition, I experimented with a <strong>variety of models and strategies</strong>. While some models offered <strong>ease of use and robust baseline performance</strong>, others required more careful tuning to achieve optimal results. <strong>Stability and reproducibility</strong> emerged as important considerations, particularly in the final evaluation stage.</p>",
  "comments": [],
  "comment_count": 0,
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 3213457,
      "postDate": "2025-05-30T03:38:54.810Z",
      "content": "<h1>Acknowledgements and Reflections on the Competition</h1>\n<p>First of all, I would like to express my <strong>sincere gratitude to Kaggle</strong> for organizing this competition, which provided an excellent opportunity to expand my knowledge and skills.  <br>\nI would also like to thank Kawsar Hossain <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/kawchar85\" target=\"_blank\">@kawchar85</a> for his insightful post  (<a href=\"url\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drawing-with-llms/discussion/576181#3207144</a>), which served as a significant source of inspiration for my work.</p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Competition Dynamics</h2>\n<p>In the final week of the competition, the dynamics on the leaderboard <strong>intensified considerably</strong>, leading me to suspect that a novel state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-image model might have been discovered by some participants.</p>\n<p>Consequently, I conducted a thorough review of recent publications on <strong>arXiv</strong>, <strong>Hugging Face</strong>, and <strong>OpenReview</strong>, yet found no substantial breakthroughs.  <br>\nThis prompted me to re-evaluate my strategy and focus on <strong>optimizing my existing solution</strong>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F11102957%2F47a97fe6b9b1d7b167851a19364db6df%2FP1.jpg?generation=1748576315051200&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"Figure 1\"></p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Key Experimental Findings</h2>\n<p>Below is a summary of key experimental findings from the competition:</p>\n<h3>1. <strong>SDXL Base / Turbo and SDXL Hyper</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>User-friendly</strong> and require minimal parameter tuning.</li>\n<li>Facilitate a <strong>lower barrier to entry</strong>.</li>\n<li>I adopted this approach during the mid-stage, which initially achieved a <strong>high ranking</strong> but declined towards the end.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>2. <strong>SANA 1.5</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Performs well with <strong>straightforward parameter settings</strong>, yielding relatively high scores.</li>\n<li>I hypothesize that <strong>more advanced hyperparameter optimization</strong> could further improve performance; however, time constraints precluded additional exploration.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>3. <strong>DMD2 (4-step UNet generation)</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>One of my final choices.</li>\n<li>By utilizing the <strong>demo code provided in the Model Card</strong>, I achieved a high score with minimal effort.</li>\n<li><strong>Simple parameter adjustments</strong> resulted in an approximate <strong>0.02 improvement</strong>.</li>\n<li>Further fine-tuning could yield even better results.</li>\n<li><strong>Demonstrated considerable stability</strong>.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>4. <strong>SDXL Flash</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Also among my final submissions.</li>\n<li>Achieved a score of <strong>0.67 on the public leaderboard</strong> using the demo code.</li>\n<li><strong>Basic parameter tuning</strong> allowed for further improvements.</li>\n<li><strong>Limitation:</strong> Instability—identical configurations often produced significantly different results across multiple submissions.</li>\n</ul>\n<hr>\n<h2>Summary</h2>\n<p>Throughout the competition, I experimented with a <strong>variety of models and strategies</strong>. While some models offered <strong>ease of use and robust baseline performance</strong>, others required more careful tuning to achieve optimal results. <strong>Stability and reproducibility</strong> emerged as important considerations, particularly in the final evaluation stage.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "# Acknowledgements and Reflections on the Competition\n\nFirst of all, I would like to express my **sincere gratitude to Kaggle** for organizing this competition, which provided an excellent opportunity to expand my knowledge and skills.  \nI would also like to thank Kawsar Hossain @kawchar85 for his insightful post  ([https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drawing-with-llms/discussion/576181#3207144](url)), which served as a significant source of inspiration for my work.\n\n---\n\n## Competition Dynamics\n\nIn the final week of the competition, the dynamics on the leaderboard **intensified considerably**, leading me to suspect that a novel state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-image model might have been discovered by some participants.\n\nConsequently, I conducted a thorough review of recent publications on **arXiv**, **Hugging Face**, and **OpenReview**, yet found no substantial breakthroughs.  \nThis prompted me to re-evaluate my strategy and focus on **optimizing my existing solution**.\n\n![Figure 1](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F11102957%2F47a97fe6b9b1d7b167851a19364db6df%2FP1.jpg?generation=1748576315051200&alt=media)\n\n---\n\n## Key Experimental Findings\n\nBelow is a summary of key experimental findings from the competition:\n\n### 1. **SDXL Base / Turbo and SDXL Hyper**\n- **User-friendly** and require minimal parameter tuning.\n- Facilitate a **lower barrier to entry**.\n- I adopted this approach during the mid-stage, which initially achieved a **high ranking** but declined towards the end.\n\n### 2. **SANA 1.5**\n- Performs well with **straightforward parameter settings**, yielding relatively high scores.\n- I hypothesize that **more advanced hyperparameter optimization** could further improve performance; however, time constraints precluded additional exploration.\n\n### 3. **DMD2 (4-step UNet generation)**\n- One of my final choices.\n- By utilizing the **demo code provided in the Model Card**, I achieved a high score with minimal effort.\n- **Simple parameter adjustments** resulted in an approximate **0.02 improvement**.\n- Further fine-tuning could yield even better results.\n- **Demonstrated considerable stability**.\n\n### 4. **SDXL Flash**\n- Also among my final submissions.\n- Achieved a score of **0.67 on the public leaderboard** using the demo code.\n- **Basic parameter tuning** allowed for further improvements.\n- **Limitation:** Instability—identical configurations often produced significantly different results across multiple submissions.\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\nThroughout the competition, I experimented with a **variety of models and strategies**. While some models offered **ease of use and robust baseline performance**, others required more careful tuning to achieve optimal results. **Stability and reproducibility** emerged as important considerations, particularly in the final evaluation stage.",
      "votes": 10
    }
  ],
  "complete": true,
  "source": "live",
  "fetched_at": "2026-10-20T09:10:51Z",
  "competition_id": 89659,
  "competition_slug": "drawing-with-llms",
  "team_id": 13668860,
  "solution_url": "/competitions/drawing-with-llms/writeups/sota-is-all-you-need-45th-place-solution"
}