In the page https://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/prizes there is an information "An award will be given to the team that, as judged by the LHCb collaboration members on the organizing committee, creates a model that is most useful for the LHCb experiment". I have two questions to this:
\n\nI would vote for improving as the best result on LB not always means the best physically sound solution.
", "messages": [ { "id": "95963", "postDate": "10/13/2015 08:36:34", "content": "In the page https://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/prizes there is an information "An award will be given to the team that, as judged by the LHCb collaboration members on the organizing committee, creates a model that is most useful for the LHCb experiment". I have two questions to this:
\n\nI would vote for improving as the best result on LB not always means the best physically sound solution.
", "rawMarkdown": "In the page https://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/prizes there is an information \"An award will be given to the team that, as judged by the LHCb collaboration members on the organizing committee, creates a model that is most useful for the LHCb experiment\". I have two questions to this:\r\n\r\n1. What is a deadline for submitting solutions?\r\n2. May we still improve our models (till this deadline) from the perspective of physical soundness, or this must be the exact model that earns highest score on LB.\r\n\r\nI would vote for improving as the best result on LB not always means the best physically sound solution.", "votes": null }, { "id": "96001", "postDate": "10/13/2015 16:09:24", "content": "Michal, check out this\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/timeline
", "rawMarkdown": "Michal, check out this\r\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/timeline", "votes": null }, { "id": "96004", "postDate": "10/13/2015 17:31:30", "content": "Thank you. Didn't notice this.
", "rawMarkdown": "Thank you. Didn't notice this.", "votes": null }, { "id": "96010", "postDate": "10/13/2015 18:47:44", "content": "Just to be sure, by "provide code for their models and a textual description " organizers understand submitting them here as scripts?
", "rawMarkdown": "Just to be sure, by \"provide code for their models and a textual description \" organizers understand submitting them here as scripts?", "votes": null }, { "id": "96130", "postDate": "10/14/2015 17:34:37", "content": "@Michal,\nIf I well understand the rules, you will be next one to the prize if one of the winning team do not fulfil the requirements.\nAdditionally, if you (and others from top 20) think your model may be interested for high energy physicists because of e.g. a new feature which has surprisingly new sense, you may apply for 2000$ for a trip to Zurich. Read "Prizes" carefully. Good luck.
", "rawMarkdown": "Michal,\r\nIf I well understand the rules, you will be next one to the prize if one of the winning team do not fulfil the requirements.\r\nAdditionally, if you (and others from top 20) think your model may be interested for high energy physicists because of e.g. a new feature which has surprisingly new sense, you may apply for 2000$ for a trip to Zurich. Read \"Prizes\" carefully. Good luck.", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 96001, "author_name": "aguschin", "author_url": "", "post_date": "10/13/2015 16:09:24", "content": "Michal, check out this\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/timeline
", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 96004, "author_name": "chalmi", "author_url": "", "post_date": "10/13/2015 17:31:30", "content": "Thank you. Didn't notice this.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 96010, "author_name": "chalmi", "author_url": "", "post_date": "10/13/2015 18:47:44", "content": "Just to be sure, by "provide code for their models and a textual description " organizers understand submitting them here as scripts?
", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 96130, "author_name": "sionek", "author_url": "", "post_date": "10/14/2015 17:34:37", "content": "@Michal,\nIf I well understand the rules, you will be next one to the prize if one of the winning team do not fulfil the requirements.\nAdditionally, if you (and others from top 20) think your model may be interested for high energy physicists because of e.g. a new feature which has surprisingly new sense, you may apply for 2000$ for a trip to Zurich. Read "Prizes" carefully. Good luck.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "95963": "In the page https://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/prizes there is an information \"An award will be given to the team that, as judged by the LHCb collaboration members on the organizing committee, creates a model that is most useful for the LHCb experiment\". I have two questions to this:\r\n\r\n1. What is a deadline for submitting solutions?\r\n2. May we still improve our models (till this deadline) from the perspective of physical soundness, or this must be the exact model that earns highest score on LB.\r\n\r\nI would vote for improving as the best result on LB not always means the best physically sound solution.", "96001": "Michal, check out this\r\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/flavours-of-physics/details/timeline", "96004": "Thank you. Didn't notice this.", "96010": "Just to be sure, by \"provide code for their models and a textual description \" organizers understand submitting them here as scripts?", "96130": "Michal,\r\nIf I well understand the rules, you will be next one to the prize if one of the winning team do not fulfil the requirements.\r\nAdditionally, if you (and others from top 20) think your model may be interested for high energy physicists because of e.g. a new feature which has surprisingly new sense, you may apply for 2000$ for a trip to Zurich. Read \"Prizes\" carefully. Good luck." }, "source": "meta" }