{ "id": 106251, "title": "Bad luck :( ", "url": "/competitions/generative-dog-images/discussion/106251", "author_name": "", "post_date": "2019-08-28T23:18:42.537596Z", "votes": 4, "comment_count": 5, "views": 0, "content": "

I missed the opportunity to be third\n\"\".bmp?generation=1567034164524391&alt=media)

", "messages": [ { "id": "610627", "postDate": "08/28/2019 23:18:42", "content": "

I missed the opportunity to be third\n\"\".bmp?generation=1567034164524391&alt=media)

", "rawMarkdown": "I missed the opportunity to be third\n![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1671314%2Fbdafe1c6835b4e143aa200132be595ed%2FNouvelle%20image%20bitmap%20(2).bmp?generation=1567034164524391&alt=media)", "votes": null }, { "id": "610790", "postDate": "08/29/2019 01:19:04", "content": "

and I missed the opportunity to be 1st... is part of the competition I guess :) keep going, it will happen again

", "rawMarkdown": "and I missed the opportunity to be 1st... is part of the competition I guess :) keep going, it will happen again", "votes": null }, { "id": "611918", "postDate": "08/29/2019 13:58:51", "content": "

to be honest, now I check the image real quick, why did you selected x2 submissions with +- 7 score??

\n\n
    \n
  1. You are expert (x2 bronze medals) and kaggle sent a email indicating that you had to select 2 subs, so I'm completely sure you selected those 2 submissions.
    2. \n
  2. why did you selected those 2? the score reminds me to Memorizer GAN so I think you decided to take the risk and submit memorizer, even when you knew it wasn't allowed (I guess you tought: kaggle is not going to check every kernel...)\nso I think you wasted a good opportunity
    3. \n
", "rawMarkdown": "to be honest, now I check the image real quick, why did you selected x2 submissions with +- 7 score??\n\n1. You are expert (x2 bronze medals) and kaggle sent a email indicating that you had to select 2 subs, so I'm completely sure you selected those 2 submissions.\n2. why did you selected those 2? the score reminds me to *Memorizer GAN* so I think you decided to take the risk and submit memorizer, even when you knew it wasn't allowed (I guess you tought: kaggle is not going to check every kernel...)\nso I think you wasted a good opportunity", "votes": null }, { "id": "612107", "postDate": "08/29/2019 15:54:27", "content": "

Yes exacly :(

", "rawMarkdown": "Yes exacly :(", "votes": null }, { "id": "612145", "postDate": "08/29/2019 16:08:32", "content": "

Is that public LB 24 GAN not a memorizer GAN? \nIt is possible that it too might be a memorizer GAN and even if you did select it, it would again get a 9999999... score. \nIt might be 57 for now because organizers never manually inspected it (since it wasn't your final submission)\nHowever, if that was a legit GAN... I have no idea why will you not choose it. Public LB 24 would easily be one of the best GANs around.

", "rawMarkdown": "Is that public LB 24 GAN not a memorizer GAN? \nIt is possible that it too might be a memorizer GAN and even if you did select it, it would again get a 9999999... score. \nIt might be 57 for now because organizers never manually inspected it (since it wasn't your final submission)\nHowever, if that was a legit GAN... I have no idea why will you not choose it. Public LB 24 would easily be one of the best GANs around.", "votes": null }, { "id": "612152", "postDate": "08/29/2019 16:13:43", "content": "

No it's not a memorizer it's just a simple gan and for the other kernels choosed , one for memoriser ans other use pythorch but I try to choose one memoriser and other for best public lb

", "rawMarkdown": "No it's not a memorizer it's just a simple gan and for the other kernels choosed , one for memoriser ans other use pythorch but I try to choose one memoriser and other for best public lb", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 610790, "author_name": "jesucristo", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/29/2019 01:19:04", "content": "

and I missed the opportunity to be 1st... is part of the competition I guess :) keep going, it will happen again

", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 611918, "author_name": "jesucristo", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/29/2019 13:58:51", "content": "

to be honest, now I check the image real quick, why did you selected x2 submissions with +- 7 score??

\n\n
    \n
  1. You are expert (x2 bronze medals) and kaggle sent a email indicating that you had to select 2 subs, so I'm completely sure you selected those 2 submissions.
    2. \n
  2. why did you selected those 2? the score reminds me to Memorizer GAN so I think you decided to take the risk and submit memorizer, even when you knew it wasn't allowed (I guess you tought: kaggle is not going to check every kernel...)\nso I think you wasted a good opportunity
    3. \n
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 612107, "author_name": "moussaid", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/29/2019 15:54:27", "content": "

Yes exacly :(

", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 612145, "author_name": "timetraveller98", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/29/2019 16:08:32", "content": "

Is that public LB 24 GAN not a memorizer GAN? \nIt is possible that it too might be a memorizer GAN and even if you did select it, it would again get a 9999999... score. \nIt might be 57 for now because organizers never manually inspected it (since it wasn't your final submission)\nHowever, if that was a legit GAN... I have no idea why will you not choose it. Public LB 24 would easily be one of the best GANs around.

", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 612152, "author_name": "moussaid", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/29/2019 16:13:43", "content": "

No it's not a memorizer it's just a simple gan and for the other kernels choosed , one for memoriser ans other use pythorch but I try to choose one memoriser and other for best public lb

", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "610627": "I missed the opportunity to be third\n![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1671314%2Fbdafe1c6835b4e143aa200132be595ed%2FNouvelle%20image%20bitmap%20(2).bmp?generation=1567034164524391&alt=media)", "610790": "and I missed the opportunity to be 1st... is part of the competition I guess :) keep going, it will happen again", "611918": "to be honest, now I check the image real quick, why did you selected x2 submissions with +- 7 score??\n\n1. You are expert (x2 bronze medals) and kaggle sent a email indicating that you had to select 2 subs, so I'm completely sure you selected those 2 submissions.\n2. why did you selected those 2? the score reminds me to *Memorizer GAN* so I think you decided to take the risk and submit memorizer, even when you knew it wasn't allowed (I guess you tought: kaggle is not going to check every kernel...)\nso I think you wasted a good opportunity", "612107": "Yes exacly :(", "612145": "Is that public LB 24 GAN not a memorizer GAN? \nIt is possible that it too might be a memorizer GAN and even if you did select it, it would again get a 9999999... score. \nIt might be 57 for now because organizers never manually inspected it (since it wasn't your final submission)\nHowever, if that was a legit GAN... I have no idea why will you not choose it. Public LB 24 would easily be one of the best GANs around.", "612152": "No it's not a memorizer it's just a simple gan and for the other kernels choosed , one for memoriser ans other use pythorch but I try to choose one memoriser and other for best public lb" }, "source": "meta" }