{
  "id": 170263,
  "title": "Will there be shakeup?",
  "url": "/competitions/global-wheat-detection/discussion/170263",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2020-07-27T04:37:57.070506900Z",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Any idea?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "947097",
      "postDate": "07/27/2020 04:37:57",
      "content": "<p>Any idea?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Any idea?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "947720",
      "postDate": "07/27/2020 12:53:26",
      "content": "<p>Yes I think there will be a shakeup, a lot depends on how Kaggle handle removing Yolov5 entries. As most people already know, this licence is not compatible with the competition regulations.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yes I think there will be a shakeup, a lot depends on how Kaggle handle removing Yolov5 entries. As most people already know, this licence is not compatible with the competition regulations.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "948245",
      "postDate": "07/27/2020 18:57:57",
      "content": "<p>i dont think shakeup will be too big , but i didnt do much on this comp.  Seems like these object detection comps shakeup should be smaller, and also the public LB size is so big for this competition. The distribution is also said to be similar for private.  I dont know for sure of course. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "i dont think shakeup will be too big , but i didnt do much on this comp.  Seems like these object detection comps shakeup should be smaller, and also the public LB size is so big for this competition. The distribution is also said to be similar for private.  I dont know for sure of course.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "951213",
      "postDate": "07/30/2020 01:55:12",
      "content": "<p>Looks like many people tune their psuedo labeling based on LB.\nThat's a dangerous sign🔥 </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Looks like many people tune their psuedo labeling based on LB.\nThat's a dangerous sign🔥",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 947720,
      "author_name": "datahobbit",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/27/2020 12:53:26",
      "content": "<p>Yes I think there will be a shakeup, a lot depends on how Kaggle handle removing Yolov5 entries. As most people already know, this licence is not compatible with the competition regulations.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 948245,
      "author_name": "bopengiowa",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/27/2020 18:57:57",
      "content": "<p>i dont think shakeup will be too big , but i didnt do much on this comp.  Seems like these object detection comps shakeup should be smaller, and also the public LB size is so big for this competition. The distribution is also said to be similar for private.  I dont know for sure of course. </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 951213,
      "author_name": "kyoshioka47",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/30/2020 01:55:12",
      "content": "<p>Looks like many people tune their psuedo labeling based on LB.\nThat's a dangerous sign🔥 </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "947097": "Any idea?",
    "947720": "Yes I think there will be a shakeup, a lot depends on how Kaggle handle removing Yolov5 entries. As most people already know, this licence is not compatible with the competition regulations.",
    "948245": "i dont think shakeup will be too big , but i didnt do much on this comp.  Seems like these object detection comps shakeup should be smaller, and also the public LB size is so big for this competition. The distribution is also said to be similar for private.  I dont know for sure of course.",
    "951213": "Looks like many people tune their psuedo labeling based on LB.\nThat's a dangerous sign🔥"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}