![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1594729%2Fe9a4087af6068409fc89418fb59ac3de%2FScreenshot%20from%202020-08-07%2020-50-01.png?generation=1596813797358777&alt=media\")
The last update I found by the hosts is this-
A lot of people, including our team had chosen compliant solutions even when the YOLOv5 models were clearly outperforming the Effdet solutions. It feels like we are getting cheated and all of our efforts have been completely gone to waste. Can Kaggle or the hosts at least provide us an update if they are in the process of removing the non-compliant solutions?
", "messages": [ { "id": 961883, "postDate": "2020-08-07T15:29:29.440Z", "content": "The last update I found by the hosts is this-
A lot of people, including our team had chosen compliant solutions even when the YOLOv5 models were clearly outperforming the Effdet solutions. It feels like we are getting cheated and all of our efforts have been completely gone to waste. Can Kaggle or the hosts at least provide us an update if they are in the process of removing the non-compliant solutions?
", "rawMarkdown": "The last update I found by the hosts is this-\n\nA lot of people, including our team had chosen compliant solutions even when the YOLOv5 models were clearly outperforming the Effdet solutions. It feels like we are getting cheated and all of our efforts have been completely gone to waste. Can Kaggle or the hosts at least provide us an update if they are in the process of removing the non-compliant solutions? ", "votes": 19 }, { "id": 962409, "postDate": "2020-08-08T05:39:25.257Z", "content": "There is an update (new comment from the host):\n![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F5007869%2Fe0d2e743e18e11a1584e09747507854a%2FM4Ja9Twa1v4.jpg?generation=1596865139221415&alt=media\")
\nDiscussion: https://www.kaggle.com/c/global-wheat-detection/discussion/172589
I think they will be removing YOLO subs since most of the gold teams seems to be using YOLO too (only two solutions shared!).
\nLet's trust kaggle and the hosts on this ;)
Agree. This competition is organized in a confusing way...
", "rawMarkdown": "Agree. This competition is organized in a confusing way...", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 964435, "postDate": "2020-08-09T21:40:04.673Z", "content": "I think they are removing some submission, My Rank automatically changed from 1303 to 1291 today on Private LB.
", "rawMarkdown": "I think they are removing some submission, My Rank automatically changed from 1303 to 1291 today on Private LB.\n", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 964442, "postDate": "2020-08-09T22:04:26.347Z", "content": "no, I guess they just re-ran against new test set
", "rawMarkdown": "no, I guess they just re-ran against new test set", "votes": 3 } ] }, { "id": 963266, "postDate": "2020-08-08T20:10:07.027Z", "content": "the weird thing is that in the dog competition last year kaggle has informed the participants how and when they will check for compliance and they asked them to not delete there kernels or else they will be disqualified \nin this competition everything seems quite foggy..\nI hope everyone deserves a medal gets it in the end
", "rawMarkdown": "the weird thing is that in the dog competition last year kaggle has informed the participants how and when they will check for compliance and they asked them to not delete there kernels or else they will be disqualified \nin this competition everything seems quite foggy..\nI hope everyone deserves a medal gets it in the end ", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 962414, "postDate": "2020-08-08T05:46:31.493Z", "content": "How do you decide if the solution is compliant or not?
", "rawMarkdown": "How do you decide if the solution is compliant or not?", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 962470, "postDate": "2020-08-08T06:32:52.700Z", "content": "If the solution is MIT license compatible it is compliant else non compliant.
\nY5 is GPL3 license
Mini typo: it should be MIT license compatible. And yes, Apache 2.0 is alright.
", "rawMarkdown": "Mini typo: it should be MIT license compatible. And yes, Apache 2.0 is alright. " } ] }, { "id": 961943, "postDate": "2020-08-07T16:29:04.670Z", "content": "From what others have said, I expect it to take a couple weeks. So it's best to be patient.
", "rawMarkdown": "From what others have said, I expect it to take a couple weeks. So it's best to be patient.", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 961951, "postDate": "2020-08-07T16:46:11.643Z", "content": "Wish the hosts could communicate more at least :/
", "rawMarkdown": "Wish the hosts could communicate more at least :/", "votes": 5 } ] }, { "id": 962036, "postDate": "2020-08-07T18:31:43.720Z", "content": "Not sure why i am getting downvoted for asking an update
", "rawMarkdown": "Not sure why i am getting downvoted for asking an update" }, { "id": 962770, "postDate": "2020-08-08T12:36:26.797Z", "content": "Thanks for sharing ...
", "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for sharing ..." } ], "comments": [ { "id": 962409, "author_name": "Vadim Timakin", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-08T05:39:25.257000", "content": "There is an update (new comment from the host):\n\nDiscussion: https://www.kaggle.com/c/global-wheat-detection/discussion/172589
I think they will be removing YOLO subs since most of the gold teams seems to be using YOLO too (only two solutions shared!).
\nLet's trust kaggle and the hosts on this ;)
Agree. This competition is organized in a confusing way...
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 964435, "author_name": "Shahrukh Khan", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-09T21:40:04.673000", "content": "I think they are removing some submission, My Rank automatically changed from 1303 to 1291 today on Private LB.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 964442, "author_name": "Jacob", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-09T22:04:26.347000", "content": "no, I guess they just re-ran against new test set
", "votes": 3, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 963266, "author_name": "mohaned abid", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-08T20:10:07.027000", "content": "the weird thing is that in the dog competition last year kaggle has informed the participants how and when they will check for compliance and they asked them to not delete there kernels or else they will be disqualified \nin this competition everything seems quite foggy..\nI hope everyone deserves a medal gets it in the end
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 962414, "author_name": "Amritvir Singh", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-08T05:46:31.493000", "content": "How do you decide if the solution is compliant or not?
", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 962470, "author_name": "Tanmay Pandey", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-08T06:32:52.700000", "content": "If the solution is MIT license compatible it is compliant else non compliant.
\nY5 is GPL3 license
Mini typo: it should be MIT license compatible. And yes, Apache 2.0 is alright.
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 961943, "author_name": "Matt", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-07T16:29:04.670000", "content": "From what others have said, I expect it to take a couple weeks. So it's best to be patient.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 961951, "author_name": "Tanmay Pandey", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-07T16:46:11.643000", "content": "Wish the hosts could communicate more at least :/
", "votes": 5, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 962036, "author_name": "Tanmay Pandey", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-07T18:31:43.720000", "content": "Not sure why i am getting downvoted for asking an update
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 962770, "author_name": "Shaitender Singh", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2020-08-08T12:36:26.797000", "content": "Thanks for sharing ...
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "961883": "The last update I found by the hosts is this-\n\nA lot of people, including our team had chosen compliant solutions even when the YOLOv5 models were clearly outperforming the Effdet solutions. It feels like we are getting cheated and all of our efforts have been completely gone to waste. Can Kaggle or the hosts at least provide us an update if they are in the process of removing the non-compliant solutions? ", "962409": "There is an update (new comment from the host):\n\nDiscussion: https://www.kaggle.com/c/global-wheat-detection/discussion/172589", "964539": "I think they will be removing YOLO subs since most of the gold teams seems to be using YOLO too (only two solutions shared!).\nLet's trust kaggle and the hosts on this ;)", "965802": "Agree. This competition is organized in a confusing way...", "964435": "I think they are removing some submission, My Rank automatically changed from 1303 to 1291 today on Private LB.\n", "963266": "the weird thing is that in the dog competition last year kaggle has informed the participants how and when they will check for compliance and they asked them to not delete there kernels or else they will be disqualified \nin this competition everything seems quite foggy..\nI hope everyone deserves a medal gets it in the end ", "962414": "How do you decide if the solution is compliant or not?", "961943": "From what others have said, I expect it to take a couple weeks. So it's best to be patient.", "962036": "Not sure why i am getting downvoted for asking an update", "962770": "Thanks for sharing ..." } }