{
  "id": 23235,
  "title": "Leaderboard Results Final!",
  "url": "/competitions/grupo-bimbo-inventory-demand/discussion/23235",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2016-08-31T22:32:12.447Z",
  "votes": 25,
  "comment_count": 8,
  "views": 1825,
  "content": "<p>Thank you to all the participants in the Grupo Bimbo Inventory Competition, and congratulations to the winners! The results on the leaderboard are now final. I will be in touch with the winning teams about collecting solutions &amp; next steps.</p>\n\n<p>Multiple accounts holders (aka cheaters) have been removed. In this competition, this resulted in a change in the prize winners.  If you think you have been incorrectly removed, please contact our <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/compliance\">compliance team</a> and make sure you answer the questions.</p>\n\n<p>And a big thank you to the host team at Grupo Bimbo for bringing this exciting challenge to our community!  I've found myself both interested in the results and hungry for some Grupo Bimbo snacks...</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "133206",
      "postDate": "08/31/2016 22:32:12",
      "content": "<p>Thank you to all the participants in the Grupo Bimbo Inventory Competition, and congratulations to the winners! The results on the leaderboard are now final. I will be in touch with the winning teams about collecting solutions &amp; next steps.</p>\n\n<p>Multiple accounts holders (aka cheaters) have been removed. In this competition, this resulted in a change in the prize winners.  If you think you have been incorrectly removed, please contact our <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/compliance\">compliance team</a> and make sure you answer the questions.</p>\n\n<p>And a big thank you to the host team at Grupo Bimbo for bringing this exciting challenge to our community!  I've found myself both interested in the results and hungry for some Grupo Bimbo snacks...</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thank you to all the participants in the Grupo Bimbo Inventory Competition, and congratulations to the winners! The results on the leaderboard are now final. I will be in touch with the winning teams about collecting solutions & next steps.\r\n\r\nMultiple accounts holders (aka cheaters) have been removed. In this competition, this resulted in a change in the prize winners.  If you think you have been incorrectly removed, please contact our [compliance team][1] and make sure you answer the questions.\r\n\r\nAnd a big thank you to the host team at Grupo Bimbo for bringing this exciting challenge to our community!  I've found myself both interested in the results and hungry for some Grupo Bimbo snacks...\r\n\r\n\r\n  [1]: https://www.kaggle.com/compliance",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133210",
      "postDate": "08/31/2016 22:49:37",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for this competition, Bimbo, and congrats to the winners! :)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for this competition, Bimbo, and congrats to the winners! :)",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133221",
      "postDate": "09/01/2016 00:12:34",
      "content": "<p>Ditto!</p>\n\n<p>... and quite a bit of of the top 100 got dropped.  And I can't remember the last time two of the top 5 went away...</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Ditto!\r\n\r\n... and quite a bit of of the top 100 got dropped.  And I can't remember the last time two of the top 5 went away...",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133459",
      "postDate": "09/02/2016 11:21:32",
      "content": "<p>I still didn't understand if final score is calculated based on only 11th week or total of 10th and 11th week?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I still didn't understand if final score is calculated based on only 11th week or total of 10th and 11th week?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133629",
      "postDate": "09/03/2016 01:12:09",
      "content": "<p>@BerkerKozan, should be week 11 only. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "BerkerKozan, should be week 11 only.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133707",
      "postDate": "09/03/2016 13:28:29",
      "content": "<p>@rcarson,</p>\n\n<p>We made 2 models for 10th and 11th week.</p>\n\n<p>6,7 train -&gt; 8 (for 10th)\n6,7 train -&gt; 9 (for 11th)</p>\n\n<p>So, we spent completely pointless time on the 1st model for public score.\nI think, public score should be a mixture of week 10 and 11, and private score should be total of it.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "rcarson,\r\n\r\nWe made 2 models for 10th and 11th week.\r\n\r\n6,7 train -> 8 (for 10th)\r\n6,7 train -> 9 (for 11th)\r\n\r\nSo, we spent completely pointless time on the 1st model for public score.\r\nI think, public score should be a mixture of week 10 and 11, and private score should be total of it.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133880",
      "postDate": "09/04/2016 09:02:44",
      "content": "<p>@BerkerKozan,</p>\n\n<p>the fact that private LB was week 11 only was made clear in the forum after few weeks.  You should read all the forum of a competition when you enter it.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "BerkerKozan,\r\n\r\nthe fact that private LB was week 11 only was made clear in the forum after few weeks.  You should read all the forum of a competition when you enter it.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "133886",
      "postDate": "09/04/2016 09:55:35",
      "content": "<p>@CPMP,</p>\n\n<p>Read most of forum, 1st competition of me. I guess i realized our mistake, Our setup should be like;</p>\n\n<p>6-7 -&gt; 9, 7-8 -&gt; 10, 8-9 -&gt; 11 and not including lag1 variables to model as warned before in the forum. Right?</p>\n\n<p>Experience :)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "CPMP,\r\n\r\nRead most of forum, 1st competition of me. I guess i realized our mistake, Our setup should be like;\r\n\r\n6-7 -> 9, 7-8 -> 10, 8-9 -> 11 and not including lag1 variables to model as warned before in the forum. Right?\r\n\r\nExperience :)",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "134393",
      "postDate": "09/06/2016 13:16:17",
      "content": "<p>I you want to make sure you predict 2 weeks ahead, then yes.  But it seems that those who did not care and predicted one week ahead did as well.  It was true for me: my best model predicting one week ahead was as good as my best model predicting 2 weeks ahead.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I you want to make sure you predict 2 weeks ahead, then yes.  But it seems that those who did not care and predicted one week ahead did as well.  It was true for me: my best model predicting one week ahead was as good as my best model predicting 2 weeks ahead.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 133210,
      "author_name": "alexryzhkov",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/31/2016 22:49:37",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for this competition, Bimbo, and congrats to the winners! :)</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133221,
      "author_name": "happycube",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/01/2016 00:12:34",
      "content": "<p>Ditto!</p>\n\n<p>... and quite a bit of of the top 100 got dropped.  And I can't remember the last time two of the top 5 went away...</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133459,
      "author_name": "berkerkozan",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/02/2016 11:21:32",
      "content": "<p>I still didn't understand if final score is calculated based on only 11th week or total of 10th and 11th week?</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133629,
      "author_name": "jiweiliu",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/03/2016 01:12:09",
      "content": "<p>@BerkerKozan, should be week 11 only. </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133707,
      "author_name": "berkerkozan",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/03/2016 13:28:29",
      "content": "<p>@rcarson,</p>\n\n<p>We made 2 models for 10th and 11th week.</p>\n\n<p>6,7 train -&gt; 8 (for 10th)\n6,7 train -&gt; 9 (for 11th)</p>\n\n<p>So, we spent completely pointless time on the 1st model for public score.\nI think, public score should be a mixture of week 10 and 11, and private score should be total of it.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133880,
      "author_name": "cpmpml",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/04/2016 09:02:44",
      "content": "<p>@BerkerKozan,</p>\n\n<p>the fact that private LB was week 11 only was made clear in the forum after few weeks.  You should read all the forum of a competition when you enter it.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 133886,
      "author_name": "berkerkozan",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/04/2016 09:55:35",
      "content": "<p>@CPMP,</p>\n\n<p>Read most of forum, 1st competition of me. I guess i realized our mistake, Our setup should be like;</p>\n\n<p>6-7 -&gt; 9, 7-8 -&gt; 10, 8-9 -&gt; 11 and not including lag1 variables to model as warned before in the forum. Right?</p>\n\n<p>Experience :)</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 134393,
      "author_name": "cpmpml",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/06/2016 13:16:17",
      "content": "<p>I you want to make sure you predict 2 weeks ahead, then yes.  But it seems that those who did not care and predicted one week ahead did as well.  It was true for me: my best model predicting one week ahead was as good as my best model predicting 2 weeks ahead.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "133206": "Thank you to all the participants in the Grupo Bimbo Inventory Competition, and congratulations to the winners! The results on the leaderboard are now final. I will be in touch with the winning teams about collecting solutions & next steps.\r\n\r\nMultiple accounts holders (aka cheaters) have been removed. In this competition, this resulted in a change in the prize winners.  If you think you have been incorrectly removed, please contact our [compliance team][1] and make sure you answer the questions.\r\n\r\nAnd a big thank you to the host team at Grupo Bimbo for bringing this exciting challenge to our community!  I've found myself both interested in the results and hungry for some Grupo Bimbo snacks...\r\n\r\n\r\n  [1]: https://www.kaggle.com/compliance",
    "133210": "Thanks for this competition, Bimbo, and congrats to the winners! :)",
    "133221": "Ditto!\r\n\r\n... and quite a bit of of the top 100 got dropped.  And I can't remember the last time two of the top 5 went away...",
    "133459": "I still didn't understand if final score is calculated based on only 11th week or total of 10th and 11th week?",
    "133629": "BerkerKozan, should be week 11 only.",
    "133707": "rcarson,\r\n\r\nWe made 2 models for 10th and 11th week.\r\n\r\n6,7 train -> 8 (for 10th)\r\n6,7 train -> 9 (for 11th)\r\n\r\nSo, we spent completely pointless time on the 1st model for public score.\r\nI think, public score should be a mixture of week 10 and 11, and private score should be total of it.",
    "133880": "BerkerKozan,\r\n\r\nthe fact that private LB was week 11 only was made clear in the forum after few weeks.  You should read all the forum of a competition when you enter it.",
    "133886": "CPMP,\r\n\r\nRead most of forum, 1st competition of me. I guess i realized our mistake, Our setup should be like;\r\n\r\n6-7 -> 9, 7-8 -> 10, 8-9 -> 11 and not including lag1 variables to model as warned before in the forum. Right?\r\n\r\nExperience :)",
    "134393": "I you want to make sure you predict 2 weeks ahead, then yes.  But it seems that those who did not care and predicted one week ahead did as well.  It was true for me: my best model predicting one week ahead was as good as my best model predicting 2 weeks ahead."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}